Hybriding Technology In Organizational Communications In Government

Vannyora Okditazeini

Abstract


The development of industry 4.0 has blurred the distance between the government and society through hybridization of technology that is applied by the government to support government transformation at the organizational and bureaucratic levels which can improve changes in organizational relations for the better. This can be seen from the new application that is used to become a bridge between the government and its citizens. In addition, the use of technology in the implementation of government performance that is more effective and efficient causes government organizations to be far from being as rigid as what has been attached to organizations so far. This research is a meta-synthesis research with a qualitative meta-aggregation approach. The results of the study show that based on the application of technology in government organizations, hybridization of technology within government organizations requires integration between information technology and social sciences, because technological hybridization is basically an organization that must be regulated.

Keywords


hybridization; technology; government organizations; science integration

Full Text:

PDF


DOI: https://doi.org/10.15548/amj-kpi.v13i02.4707
Abstract views : 88 times
PDF : 65 times

References


Anda, A., Alfian, & Syas, M. (2021). AKTIVITAS KOMUNIKASI PIMPINAN DALAM ORGANISASI. Al-Munir, 12(2), 155-165. Retrieved from https://ejournal.uinib.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/almunir/index

Bansal, M., Sirpal, V., & Choudary, M. (2021). Advancing e-Government Using Internet of Things. Mobile Computing and Sustainable Informatics, 68, 123–137. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1866-6_8

Bertot, J., Jaeger, P., & Hansen, D. (2012). The impact of polices on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations. Government information quarterly, 29(1), 30-40. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.04.004

Bloomfield, B., & Hayes, N. (2009). Power and Organizational Transformation Through Technology: Hybrids of Electronic Government. Organization Studies, 30(5), 461-487.

Bonson, E., Torres, L., Royo, S., & Flores, F. (2012). Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 29(2), 123-132. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.10.001

Cahyono, E. (2018, April 3). Harian Ekonomi Neraca. Retrieved May 28, 2018, from neraca.co.id: http://www.neraca.co.id/article/99272/revolusi-industri-40-dan-transformasi-organisasi-pemerintah

Carter, L., Yoon, V., & Liu, D. (2022). Analyzing e-government design science artifacts: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Information Management, 62, 102430. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102430

Coglianese, C. (2004). New Directions fr Digital Government Research. Social Sciences Review, 22(1), 85-91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439303259890

Dawes, S. (1994). Human Resource Implication of Information Technology in State Government. Public Personel Management, 23(1), 31-46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/009102609402300103

Dimitriu, M. (2008). Bringing citizens closer to public administration. Innovative ideas leading to an increased public participation within the decision making process. EGPA Annual Conference, Rotterdam (The Netherlands), (pp. 3-5). Netherlands.

Ebrahim, Z., & Irani, Z. (2005). E‐government adoption: architecture and barriers. Business process management journal, 11(5), 589-611. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150510619902

Fountain, J. (2001). Enacting Technology. In J. Fountain, Building the Virtual State:Information Technology and Institutional Change (pp. 1-38). Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.

Francis, C., & Baldesari. (2006). Systematic Reviews of Qualitative Literature. Oxford: UK Cochrane Centre.

Grant, G., & Chau, D. (2006). Developing a generic framework for e-government. Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), 13(1), 1-30. doi:DOI: 10.4018/jgim.2005010101

Grinin, L., Grinin, A., & Korotayev, A. (2022). COVID-19 pandemic as a trigger for the acceleration of the cybernetic revolution, transition from e-government to e-state, and change in social relations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121348

Hariguna, T., Rahardja, U., & Sarmini. (2022). The Role of E-Government Ambidexterity as the Impact of Current Technology and Public Value: An Empirical Study. Informatics, 9(3), 67. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics9030067

Hasibuan, M. (2016). Manajemen. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Irribaren, M., Concha, G., Valdes, G., Solar, M., Villarroel, M., Gutierrez, P., & Vasquez, A. (2008). Capability maturity framework for eGovernment: A multi-dimensional model and assessing tool. International Conference on Electronic Government, 136-147. doi:DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-85204-9_12

Lewin, S. (2008). Methods to Synthesis Qualitative Evidence Alongside a Cochrane Intervention Review. London: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

Linders, D. (2012). From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 446-454. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.003

Lubbers, R. (2002). Asylum for all. Harvard International Review, 24(1), 60.

Moon, M., Welch, E., & Wong, W. (2005). What drives global e-governance? An exploratory study at a macro level. 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 131-131). Big Island, HI, USA: IEEE. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2005.688

Muhammad, A. (2015). Komunikasi Organisasi. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Novianti, E., Nugraha, A., Komalasari, L., & Komariah, K. (2020). Pemanfaatn Media Sosial dalam Penyebaran Informasi Program Pemerintah (Studi Kasus Sekretariat Daerah Kabupaten Pangandaran). Al-Munir, 11(1), 48-59. Retrieved from https://ejournal.uinib.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/almunir/index

Pardo, T., Nam, T., & Burke, G. (2012). E-Government Interoperability Interaction of Policy, Management, and Tchnology Dimensions. Social Sciences Computer Review, 30(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439310392184

Pardo, T., Nam, T., & Burke, G. (2012). E-government interoperability: Interaction of policy, management, and technology dimensions. Social Science Computer Review, 30(1), 7-23. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439310392184

Perry, A., & Hammond, N. (2002). Systematic Review: The Experience of a PhD Student. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 2(1), 32-35.

Ruslan, R. (2007). Manajemen Public Relations & Media Komunikasi. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafind.

Scholl, H. J. (2005). Organizational transformation through e-government: myth or reality? International Conference on Electronic Government, 1-11. doi:DOI: 10.1007/11545156_1

Umbach, G., & Tkalec, I. (2022). Evaluating e-governance through e-government: Practices and challenges of assessing the digitalisation of public governmental services. Evaluation and Program Planning, 93, 102118. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102118

Wiyanti, R., Hasan, Y., & Usman. (2020). Iklim Organisasi Pegawai di Keprotokolan dan Keuangan Kantor Gubernur Provinsi Sumatera Barat. Al-Munir, 11(2), 108-123. Retrieved from https://ejournal.uinib.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/almunir


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 AL MUNIR : Jurnal Komunikasi dan Penyiaran Islam

Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-NonKomersial 4.0 Internasional