Andragogy Principles In Arabic Learning At Diniyyah Putri Lampung

Kemas Faisal Al-Azam


This study aims to describe the Andragogy Principles In Arabic Learning at MTs Diniyyah Putri Lampung. This research uses a qualitative approach with a case study method. This method is used because the researcher wants to explore carefully and in-depth the work or activities of individuals or all individuals at MTs Diniyyah Putri Lampung. With this approach, researchers will obtain in-depth data or information related to the purpose of this study. From the data analysis that the author did, it was concluded that there are Andragogy Principles in most of the Arabic language learning activities at MTs Diniyyah Putri Lampung. This can be seen in several aspects of learning, for example, the provision of motivation in the introduction to learning that contains useful values, the practice of providing the material that provides experience, and the material is also related to daily problems, in assignments, there are practices assigned by the teacher. . The learning process is as needed, and interesting. Students participate actively, cooperate, so as to make the learning process not rigid and the teacher uses varied learning methods that eliminate the fear factor in Arabic subjects. besides that, there is also a process of Directing and motivating but not telling (guiding and asking; not telling), and teachers and students showing enthusiasm in learning Arabic


Andragogy Prinsiples; Arabic; Learning

Full Text:


Abstract views : 109 times
PDF : 60 times


Dinata, Rahmat Satria, Intan Muflihah, dan Kemas Faisal Al-Azam. “Theories of approaches to the study of meaning in Arabic.” Islamic Manuscript of Linguistics and Humanity 2, no. 1 (2020): 55–69.

Hasyim, M. “Andragogi dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab.” Arabiyat: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab dan Kebahasaaraban 2, no. 1 (2015): 31–42.

Jarvis, Peter. Adult and continuing education: Theory and practice. Psychology Press, 1995.

Knowles, Malcolm. “Andragogy: An emerging technology for adult learning.” London, UK, 1996.

Malik, Halim. “Teori Belajar Andragogi Dan Aplikainya Dalam Pembelajaran.” Jurnal Inovasi 5, no. 2 (2008).

Nasional, Kementerian Pendidikan, dan PENDIDIKAN DAN TENAGA KEPENDIDIKAN. “Model-model pembelajaran.” Disajikan pada TOT Guru pemandu MGMP SMP in service 1 (2010).

Ollerenshaw, Jo Anne, dan John W Creswell. “Narrative research: A comparison of two restorying data analysis approaches.” Qualitative inquiry 8, no. 3 (2002): 329–47.

Ridho, Ubaid. “Evaluasi Dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab.” An Nabighoh: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab 20, no. 01 (2018): 19–26.

Slavich, George M, dan Philip G Zimbardo. “Transformational teaching: Theoretical underpinnings, basic principles, and core methods.” Educational psychology review 24, no. 4 (2012): 569–608.

Williams, Carrie. “Research methods.” Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER) 5, no. 3 (2007).

Yusri, Yusnimar. “Strategi Pembelajaran Andragogi.” Al-Fikra: Jurnal Ilmiah Keislaman 12, no. 1 (2017): 25–52.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Arab, Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang ---- Jl. M. Yunus, Lubuk Lintah, Kuranji. Kota Padang, Sumatera Barat 25153