Analisis Isi Ulasan Google Maps Terkait Aspek Perpustakaan di Perpustakaan Jakarta Cikini

Nabila Nurazizah, Lili Sudria Wenny

Abstract


Users in the digital age tend to seek information through online platforms and Google maps is one such platform that allows users to assess anything including public libraries. This research aims to find out what aspects of the library are most dominantly discussed in Jakarta Cikini Library after revitalization. This research uses quantitative content analysis with a descriptive approach. Technique sampling used was purposive sampling by limiting the review data after the revitalization of the library which was calculated from July 2022 to March 2024 as many as 1186 reviews and selecting reviews that include text as many as 667 reviews. From 667 reviews that included the text, a separation per sentence to make it easier to analyze the sub-category aspects, resulting in 1524 review sentences and processed with proportional units and positive, negative and neutral value. The concept used in this research is the ideal library by Sutarno NS with five aspects of the library namely building, collection, equipment and furniture, labor, and services. The analysis found that the building category became the most discussed category by the users with the sub-category of convenience has dominant positive value means that the users consider the library building is comfortable enough in fulfilling wants and needs in conducting library activities.

Keywords


Public Library; Online Review; Google maps.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afrina, C., Rasyid, S., Nazira, H., Oktaviani, A., Yoelanda, A. M., Syukrinur, S., & Elvi, E. (2023). Pentingnya Desain Interior terhadap Kenyamanan Pengunjung Perpustakaan. Jurnal Pustaka Ilmiah, 9(1), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.20961/jpi.v9i1.67849

Ayub, T., & Ganaie, S. (2023). User Opinion About SPS Public Library: A Study Of Google Map Reviews. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/7772

A’yunnina, Q., & Rofifah, L. (2024). Systematic literature review: Promosi perpustakaan di era digital melalui media sosial. LIBRARIA : Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi, 13(1), 11–24.

https://libraria.fppti-jateng.or.id/index.php/lib/article/view/299

Darmanto, P. (2018). Manajemen Perpustakaan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Eriyanto. (2011). Analisis Isi: Pengantar Metodologi Untuk Penelitian Ilmu Komunikasi dan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. Jakarta: Kencana.

Haq, F. U. (2020). Penggunaan Google Review Sebagai Penilaian Kepuasan Pengunjung Dalam Pariwisata. Tornare: Journal of Sustainable and Research, 2(1), 10–12. https://doi.org/10.24198/tornare.v2i1.25826

Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Mashud, A. R., & Dewi, R. O. (2022). Persepsi Pemustaka Terhadap Sikap Pustakawan pada Layanan Perpustakaan di Dinas Perpustakaan dan Kearsipan Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan. ABDI PUSTAKA: Jurnal Perpustakaan dan Kearsipan, 2(2), 58–63. https://doi.org/10.24821/jap.v2i2.6960

Nashihuddin, W. (t.t.). Aspek-Aspek Kenyamanan Ruang Perpustakaan. Diambil 9 Oktober 2025, dari https://pustakapusdokinfo.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/aspek-kenyamanan_perpustakaan.pdf

Niswaty, R., Darwis, M., M, D. A., Nasrullah, M., & Salam, R. (2020). Fasilitas Perpustakaan Sebagai Media dalam Meningkatkan Minat Baca Siswa. Khizanah Al-Hikmah : Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan, Informasi, Dan Kearsipan, 8(1), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.24252/kah.v8i1a7

Nurillah, I., Amiuza, C. B., & Ernawati, J. (2017). Tingkat Kenyamanan Desain Interior pada Perpustakaan (Studi Kasus: Perpustakaan Umum Kota Tuban, Jawa Timur). Jurnal Mahasiswa Departemen Arsitektur, 5(3). https://arsitektur.studentjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/jma/article/view/369

Nurmalina, N. (2020). Analisis kepuasan pemustaka perpustakaan Rafah Tower UIN Raden Fatah Palembang. IQRA`: Jurnal Perpustakaan dan Informasi, 14(2), 130–145. https://doi.org/10.30829/iqra.v14i2.7832

Paget, S. (2025, Januari 29). Local Consumer Review Survey. BrightLocal. https://www.brightlocal.com/research/local-consumer-review-survey/

Rachman, Y. B., & Putri, D. A. (2018). Social Media Application in Indonesian Academic Libraries. Webology, Volume 15(No 1), 19–29. https://www.webology.org/abstract.php?id=6&utm_

Rahman, M. F. N., & Jumino, J. (2020). Peran Desain Interior Dalam Menunjang Kenyamanan Pengguna di Perpustakaan Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Anuva: Jurnal Kajian Budaya, Perpustakaan, dan Informasi, 4(1), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.14710/anuva.4.1.81-98

Ramadita, I. (2015). Analisis Kualitas Layanan Perpustakaan SMA Bakti Idhata dengan Menggunakan Metode LIBQUAL+TM. https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/29384

Rejeki, S. (2020). Inovasi Dalam Pengembangan Koleksi Merupakan Daya Tarik Terhadap Kungjungan Pemustaka. Buletin Perpustakaan, 3(1), 131–146.

Rodin, R. (2017). Putakawan Profesional di Era Digital. Yogyakarta: Suluh Media.

Safii, M., & Novianto, E. (2020). Analisis Isi Ulasan Warganet Tentang Perpustakaan Melalui Local Guides Google Maps. Edulib, 10(2), 217–227. https://doi.org/10.17509/edulib.v10i2.24758

Sutarno, N. (2006). Manajemen Perpustakaan. Jakarta: Sagung Seto.

Wahyuni, S. (2015, Januari 2). Perpustakaan Ideal: Ditinjau Dari Berbagai Aspek Pendukungnya [Other]. Perpustakaan; STMIK AKAKOM Yogyakarta. http://eprints.akakom.ac.id




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15548/mj.v7i2.12706

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Maktabatuna : Jurnal Kajian Kepustakawanan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0 

Print ISSN 2723-0163 - Electronic ISSN 2723-0171

View My Stats