Ulpah Andayani


Improving the quality of scientific papers has become a concern of many circles, especially by universities. Various universities in Indonesia have now subscribed to applications or technology-based systems that are used to detect the level of similarity of a paper with other existing works. This paper aims to provide a conceptual framework model for application acceptance or a plagiarism checker system based on a review of various relevant writings and literature. The model of academic integrity and belief in technology is considered to have significance for the acceptance of the academic community towards the implementation of the plagiarism checker application or system. This model is based on reading and analyzing various relevant writings or literature. Based on these results, universities need to instill the importance of having academic integrity and providing technical skills to increase the acceptance of the academic community towards the application of plagiarism checkers to improve the quality of the scientific work produced.


Plagiarism, Technology, Scientific work

Full Text:


Abstract views : 802 times
PDF : 560 times


Ali, A. M. E. T., Abdulla, H. M. D., & Snasel, V. (2011). Overview and Comparison of Plagiarism Detection Tools. In DATESO (pp. 161-172).

Ananto, N. D., & Januarti, I. (2016). Analisa Faktor Internal dan Eksternal yang Mempengaruhi Persepsi Mahasiswa Akuntansi Terhadap Tindak Plagiarisme dengan Tekanan Variabel Moderating (Doctoral dissertation, Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis).

Aulia, F. (2017). Faktor-Faktor yang Terkait dengan Kecurangan Akademik pada Mahasiswa. Jurnal RAP (Riset Aktual Psikologi Universitas Negeri Padang), 6(1), 23-32.

Bélanger, F., & Carter, L. (2008). Trust and risk in e-government adoption. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17(2), 165-176.

Boehm, P. J., Justice, M., & Weeks, S. (2009). Promoting academic integrity in higher education. The Community College Enterprise, 15(1), 45-61.

Boehm, P. J., Justice, M., & Weeks, S. (2009). Promoting academic integrity in higher education. The Community College Enterprise, 15(1), 45-61.

Cavico, F. J., & Mujtaba, B. G. (2009). Making The Case For The Creation Of An Academic Honesty And Integrity Culture In Higher Education: Reflections And Suggestions For Reducing The Rise In Student Cheating. American Journal of Business Education (AJBE), 2(5), 75-88.

Denisova-Schmidt, E. (2017). The challenges of academic integrity in higher education: Current trends and prospects.

Freisleben, H. J. (2012). Quality and honesty in publications vs quantity. Medical Journal of Indonesia, 21(2), 59-60.

Grabner-Kräuter, S., & Faullant, R. (2010). Internet trust as a specific form of technology trust and its influence on online banking adoption. In Trust and Technology in a Ubiquitous Modern Environment: Theoretical and Methodological Perspectives (pp. 174-192). IGI global.

Gullifer, J., & Tyson, G. A. (2010). Exploring university students' perceptions of plagiarism: A focus group study. Studies in Higher Education, 35(4), 463-481.

Hage, J., Rademaker, P., & van Vugt, N. (2010). A comparison of plagiarism detection tools. Utrecht University. Utrecht, The Netherlands, 28.

Halgamuge, M. N. (2017). The use and analysis of anti‐plagiarism software: Turnitin tool for formative assessment and feedback. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 25(6), 895-909.

Howard, S. J., Ehrich, J. F., & Walton, R. (2014). Measuring students' perceptions of plagiarism: Modification and Rasch validation of a plagiarism attitude scale.

Integritas. Dikutip tanggal 3 Juli 2020 dari

Isa, T. M., & Abidin, T. F. (2013). Mengukur Tingkat Kesamaan Paragraf Menggunakan Vector Space Model untuk Mendeteksi Plagiarisme. Australian Journal of Politics and History, 53, 4.

Jann, B., Jerke, J., & Krumpal, I. (2011). Asking sensitive questions using the crosswise model: an experimental survey measuring plagiarism. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(1), 32-49.

Ledwith, A., & Rísquez, A. (2008). Using anti‐plagiarism software to promote academic honesty in the context of peer reviewed assignments. Studies in Higher Education, 33(4), 371-384.

Lee, Y. (2011). Understanding anti-plagiarism software adoption: An extended protection motivation theory perspective. Decision Support Systems, 50(2), 361-369.

Lippert, S. K., & Davis, M. (2006). A conceptual model integrating trust into planned change activities to enhance technology adoption behavior. Journal of information science, 32(5), 434-448.

Macfarlane, B., Zhang, J., & Pun, A. (2014). Academic integrity: a review of the literature. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 339-358.

Masic, I. (2012). Plagiarism in scientific publishing. Acta Informatica Medica, 20(4), 208.

Mavrinac, M., Brumini, G., Bilić-Zulle, L., & Petrovečki, M. (2010). Construction and validation of attitudes toward plagiarism questionnaire. Croatian medical journal, 51(3), 195-201.

Novanta, A. (2009). Pendeteksian Plagiarisme Pada Dokumen Teks Dengan Menggunakan Algoritma Smith-Waterman.

Nugroho, E. (2011). Perancangan Sistem Deteksi Plagiarisme Dokumen Teks Dengan Menggunakan Algoritma Rabin-Karp. Jurusan Ilmu Komputer, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang.

Osman, A. H., Salim, N., & Abuobieda, A. (2012). Survey of text plagiarism detection. Computer Engineering and Applications Journal (ComEngApp), 1(1), 37-45.

Pavlou, P. (2001). Integrating trust in electronic commerce with the technology acceptance model: model development and validation. Amcis 2001 proceedings, 159.

Potthast, M., Hagen, M., Gollub, T., Tippmann, M., Kiesel, J., Rosso, P., ... & Stein, B. (2012, September). Overview of the 4th International Competition on Plagiarism Detection. In CLEF (Online Working Notes/Labs/Workshop).

Rohmanu, A. (2016). Tata Kelola Mahasiswa Terhadap Integritas Akademik Dan Plagiarisme. Muslim Heritage, 1(2), 331-352.

Rosman, A. S., Hassan, A. M., Suratman, A. S., Ripin, M. N., & Marni, N. (2008). Persepsi Pelajar Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) Terhadap Plagiarisme. Sains Humanika, 48(1).

Rudiyanto, M. F. Persepsi Mahasiswa Terhadap Open Access dan Meningkatnya Plagiatisme di Perguruan Tinggi (Studi Kasus Mahasiswa PascaSarjana Ilmu Hukum Universitas Sumatera Utara).

Ryan, G., Bonanno, H., Krass, I., Scouller, K., & Smith, L. (2009). Undergraduate and postgraduate pharmacy students' perceptions of plagiarism and academic honesty. American journal of pharmaceutical education, 73(6), 105.

Siegrist, M. (2000). The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology. Risk analysis, 20(2), 195-204.S

Tran, U. T., Huynh, T., & Nguyen, H. T. T. (2018). Academic integrity in higher education: The case of plagiarism of graduation reports by undergraduate seniors in Vietnam. Journal of Academic Ethics, 16(1), 61-69.

Vij, R., Makhdumi, G., & Soni, N. K. (2009). Encouraging academic honesty through anti-plagiarism software.

Walker, J. (2010). Measuring plagiarism: Researching what students do, not what they say they do. Studies in Higher Education, 35(1), 41-59.

Zalnur, M. (2012). Plagiarisme Di Kalangan Mahasiswa Dalam Membuat Tugas-Tugas Perkuliahan Pada Fakultas Tarbiyah IAIN Imam Bonjol Padang. Al-Ta lim Journal, 19(1), 55-65.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 Maktabatuna

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Print ISSN 2723-0163 - Electronic ISSN 2723-0171