DISTRIBUSI FITUR DAN STRUKTUR INTELEKTUAL PUBLIKASI ILMIAH SUBJEK ILMU PERPUSTAKAAN DAN INFORMASI

Muntashir Muntashir

doi:10.15548/mj.v3i2.3737

DISTRIBUSI FITUR DAN STRUKTUR INTELEKTUAL PUBLIKASI ILMIAH SUBJEK ILMU PERPUSTAKAAN DAN INFORMASI

Muntashir Muntashir

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui profil distribusi publikasi ilmiah dan mengeksplorasi struktur intelektual terhadap publikasi subjek ilmu perpustakaan dan informasi (IPI) yang terindeks oleh pangkalan data Scopus dari tahun 2016-2018. Pendekatan bibliometrika dengan menggunakan analisis kuantitatif diadopsi untuk menggambarkan distribusi publikasi dan struktur intelektual pada dokumen yang terkait subjek IPI, kemudian data diolah dengan aplikasi excel dan VosViewer. Berdasarkan hasil analisis terhadap 15,962 dokumen dalam 226 judul sumber yang terdapat dalam Scopus, menunjukkan bahwa adanya konsistensi pertumbuhan jumlah dokumen dari tahun 2016 hingga 2018 pada subjek IPI. Bahasa Inggris masih menjadi bahasa publikasi yang dominan digunakan para peneliti. Selain itu, bahasa spanyol menunjukkan kontribusi signifikan terhadap publikasi dibandingkan bahasa lainnya. Pola kolaborasi antara penulis masih merujuk pada institusi dari Amerika Serikat, sekaligus mengindikasikan bidang perpustakaan lebih berkembang di negara tersebut. Ilmu komputer menjadi disiplin ilmu yang banyak bersinggungan dengan disiplin perpustakaan berdasarkan analisis pengkategorian area subjek. Jenis dokumen dalam bentuk artikel jurnal masih menjadi sarana komunikasi ilmiah formal yang paling banyak digunakan oleh para peneliti. Struktur intelektual publikasi subjek IPI menunjukkan pola pemetaan yang saling menguatkan untuk memahami dinamika perkembangan ilmu. Hasil peta dari analisis co-citation menguatkan peta dari co-word yang menghasilkan enam kluster topik yaitu, media sosial, bibliometrika, literasi informasi, perpustakaan perguruan tinggi, manajemen pengetahuan, dan akses terbuka.

Keywords

Bibliometrika;distribusi publikasi;struktur intelektual;ilmu perpustakaan & informasi

Full Text:

PDF

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15548/mj.v3i2.3737

Abstract views : 183 times

PDF : 154 times

References

Åström, F. (2010). The Visibility of Information Science and Library Science Research in Bibliometric Mapping of the LIS Field. The Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy., 80(2), 143–159. https://doi.org/10.1086/651005

Bauer, J., Leydesdorff, L., & Bornmann, L. (2016). Highly cited papers in Library and Information Science (LIS): Authors, institutions, and network structures. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(12), 3095–3100. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23568

Bawden, D., & Robinson, L. (2012). Introduction to Information Science. London: Facet Publishing.

Braam, R. R., Moed, H. F., & van Raan, A. F. J. (1991). Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis. I. Structural aspects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(4), 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)109 7-4571(199105)42:4<233::AID- ASI1>3.0.CO;2-I

Chua, A. Y. K., & Yang, C. C. (2008). The shift towards multi-disciplinarity in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(13), 2156– 2170. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20929

Cobo, M. J., López, Herrera, A. G., Herrera Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382–1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525

Coulter, N., Monarch, I., & Konda, S. (1998). Software engineering as seen through its research literature: A study in co-word analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(13), 1206– 1223. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)109 7-4571(1998)49:13<1206::AID- ASI7>3.0.CO;2-F

Eck, N. J. van, & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523– 538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192- 009-0146-3

Eck, N. J. van, & Waltman, L. (2017). Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 111(2), 1053–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192- 017-2300-7

Hasan, N., & Singh, M. (2015). Library and Information Science Research Output: A study based on Web of Science. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 9(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/09737766. 2015.1027089

Lugya, F. K. (2014). What counts as a science and discipline in library and information science? Library Review, 63(1/2), 138–155. https://doi.org/10.1108/LR-08- 2013-0103

Maurya, S. K., Shukla, A., & Ngurtinkhuma, R. K. (2021). Exploring Research performance of Library and Information Science Faculties in Google Scholar: A Scientometric Assessment. Journal of Indian Library Association, 57(3), 121–138.

Okubo, Y., & Zitt, M. (2004). Searching for research integration across Europe: a closer look at international and inter-regional collaboration in France. Science and Public Policy, 31(3), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154304 781780019

Pan, R. K., Kaski, K., & Fortunato, S. (2012). World citation and collaboration networks: uncovering the role of geography in science. Scientific Reports, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00902

Sa, M., & Dora, M. (2019). Research Productivity and Research Trends in the Library and Information Science Subject: A Study with reference to SCOPUS. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-Journal), 2661. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/li bphilprac/2661

Saracevic, T. (2010). Information Science. In M. J. Bates & M. N. Maack (Eds.), Encyclopedia of library and information sciences (3rd ed). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Sedighi, M. (2016). Application of word co-occurrence analysis method in mapping of the scientific fields (case study: the field of Informetrics). Library Review, 65(1/2), 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1108/LR-07- 2015-0075

Sinkovics, N. (2016). Enhancing the foundations for theorising through bibliometric mapping. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 327–350. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-10- 2014-0341

Sun, J., & Yuan, B.-Z. (2020). Bibliometric mapping of top papers in Library and Information Science based on the Essential Science Indicators Database. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 25(2), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol 25no2.4

Tseng, H., Tung, H., & Duan, C. (2010). Mapping the intellectual structure of modern leadership studies. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 31(1), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1108/014377310 11010380

Tseng, Y.-H., & Tsay, M.-Y. (2013). Journal clustering of library and information science for subfield delineation using the bibliometric analysis toolkit: CATAR. Scientometrics, 95(2), 503–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192- 013-0964-1

Walters, W. H., & Wilder, E. I. (2016). Disciplinary, national, and departmental contributions to the literature of library and information science, 2007-2012. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(6), 1487–1506. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23448

Wang, Q. (2017). Distribution features and intellectual structures of digital humanities: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Documentation. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-05- 2017-0076

White, H. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1981). Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(3), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.463032 0302

Wusu, O. H., & Lazarus, N. G. (2018). Major trends in lis research: A bibliometric analysis. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-Journal), 1873. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/lib philprac/1873

Zhai, Q., Su, J., & Ye, M. (2013). Focus on China: the current status of entrepreneurship research in China. Scientometrics, 98, 1985–2006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192- 013-1114-5

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Print ISSN 2723-0163 - Electronic ISSN 2723-0171