Hadith in the Ancient Schools of Law According to Joseph Schacht

Autor(s): Fahmi Riady, Wardatun Nadhiroh, Abdul Karim bin Khairuddin
DOI: 10.15548/mashdar.v5i1.5996

Abstract

In the 3rd century H, the traditions of the Prophet have been collected. In the sixth book (al-Kutub as-Sittah) only the traditions of the Prophet are prioritized. Before Asy-Syāfi‘ī (d. 204 H), in the ancient schools of law, the traditions of the Prophet received little attention. Based on this problem, the author tries to explore further how the hadith in ancient schools of law actually was according to Schacht. From two of Schacht's works: An Introduction to Islamic Law and The Origins of Muhammadan Jurisprudence, the author focuses on: 1). The ancient school of law according to Joseph Schacht; and 2). Hadith in ancient schools of law according to Joseph Schacht. The purpose of this discussion is to describe how Schacht's ideas about ancient schools of law and how hadiths are used by ancient schools of law. In this article the author uses a qualitative descriptive approach with documentary methods and historical analysis. The results of the study show that in the history of the development of legal doctrine, ancient schools of law were born from the activities of qādī (Islamic judges) and specialists who were concerned with legal issues. Their distinctive feature is geographical differences: Hijaz (Makkah and Medina), Iraq (Kufah and Basra), Syiria and Egypt. Their response to the popular practice and administrative regulations of the Umayyad dynasty (collapsed 132 H) gave birth to what is known as Islamic law. During the Abbasid dynasty, the ancient school of law changed into a new school of law based on loyalty to a teacher, which in turn formed groups such as the followers of Abū Ḥanīfah (d. 150 H), Mālik (d. 179 H), Sufyān aṡ-Ṡaurī ( d. 161 H), al-Auzā’ī (d. 157 H), and so on. The ancient legal schools had the same attitude towards hadith. They prioritize the traditions of the Companions rather than the traditions of the Prophet. This can be seen from Asy-Syāfi‘ī's polemic against the Medina and Iraqi schools. Other evidence is the distribution of the use of hadiths of the Prophet and traditions other than the Prophet in the book al-Muwaṭṭa’, Ᾱṡār Abū Yusūf and Ᾱṡār ash-Syaibānī.

Keywords

Ancient School of Law; Medina School; Iraqi School; Syrian School; and authority

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aʻẓamī, M. M. (1996). On Schacht’s Origins of Muhammadan jurisprudence. Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies ; Islamic Texts Society.

Asy-Syāfi‘ī, M. ibn I. (2001). Al-Umm (Ed. Rif‘at Fawzī, Cet. I). Dār al-Wafā.

at-Tanukhi, S. ibn S. (tt.). Al-Mudawwanah al-Kubra. al-Mamlakah al-’Arabiyah as-Su’udiyah.

Ayub, A. (2022). Imam al-Syafi’i dalam Kesarjanaan Barat: Tesis Schachtian dan Kritik Terhadapnya. Kalimah: Jurnal Studi Agama Dan Pemikiran Islam, Vol. 20. http://dx.doi.org/10.21111/klm.v1i1.6612

az-Zurqānī, ibn Y. (tt.). Syarḥ az-Zurqānī ‘alā al-Muwaṭṭa’ al-Imām Mālik. al-Khairiyah.

Brown, J. A. C. (2017). Hadith Muhammad’s Legacy in the Medieval and Modern World (2nd ed.). One World Academic.

Forte, D. F. (1978). Islamic Law: The Impact of Joseph Schacht. 1.

Hallaq, W. B. (2001). From Regional to Personal Schools of Law? A Reevaluation. Islamic Law and Society, 8(1), 1–26.

Hallaq, W. B. (2002). The Quest for origins or doctrine? Islamic Legal Studies As Colonialist Discourse. Journal of Islamic and Near Eastern Law, Vol. 1.

Iskandar, A., & Umardani, D. (2020). Analisis dan Kritik pada Pandangan Joseph Schacht terhadap Hadis dan Hukum Islam. Jurnal Studi Hadis Nusantara, 2.

Latif, F. (n.d.). The Sunnah and the Orientalists: A Critical Examination of Joseph Schacht’s theory. academia.edu.

Melchert, C. (1997). The Formation of the Sunni School of Law, 9 th-10 th Centuries C.E. (Vol. 4). Brill.

Melchert, C. (2022). Kitāb al-Ḥujjah ʿAlā Ahl al-Madīnah and the Transition from Regional Schools to Personal. Studia Islamica, 117(1), 64–87. https://doi.org/10.1163/19585705-12341457

Mutaqin, R. S., & Muazar, D. S. (2022). Kritik Epistemologis Ignaz Goldziher Dan Joseph Schacht Terhadap Kitab Al-Muwattha’ Imam Malik. Al-Dzikra: Jurnal Studi Ilmu al-Qur’an Dan al-Hadits, 16.

Oktaviani, S. (2023). Pemikiran Joseph Schacht terhadap Hadis.

Pahrudin, A. (2021). Pemikiran Joseph Schacht dalam Studi Hadis Kontemporer di Indonesia. Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis, 6.

Pulungan, N. H. (2022). Skeptisisme Joseph Schacht Terhadap Studi Hadis Kajian Buku The Origins Of Muhammadan Jurisprudence. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling, 4.

Putri, G. N., Meylani, H., & Agustina, I. (2022). Kritik Hadis Menurut Orientalis: Studi Komparatif Pemikiran G.H.A Juynboll dan Joseph Schacht. Integritas Terbuka: Peace and Interfaith Studies, 1(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.59029/int.v1i1.3

Qutaibah, I. (1999). Ta’wil Mukhtalif al-Ḥadīṡ. al-Maktabah al-Islami.

Rahman, F. (1979). Islam (2nd Edition). University of Chicago.

Riady, F. (2022). Nama-Nama Alternatif dalam Isnad Menurut Joseph Schacht. Mashdar: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an dan Hadis, 3(2), 31–56. https://doi.org/10.15548/mashdar.v3i2.2938

Saefulloh, A., Maghfur, A., & Sumbulah, U. (2022). Teori Dekonstruksi Hadis Josep Schacht dan Bantahan Musthafa Azami. Analisis: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 21(2), 365–386. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajsk.v21i2.8003

Safitri, D., Marna, S. M., & Amin, A. S. (2023). Metodologi Pembacaan Kritis Atas Kajian Orientalis Terhadap Hadis: (Studi Metodologi M. Muṣṭafā al-A’ẓami dalam Mengkritik Pandangan Hadits Orientalis). Madinah: Jurnal Studi Islam, 10(1), 11–29. https://doi.org/10.58518/madinah.v10i1.1495

Salman, D. (2022). Joseph Schacht`S Role In Changing The Status Of Islamic Law In Nigeria. Akdeniz Havzası ve Afrika Medeniyetleri Dergisi, 4(1), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.54132/akaf.1109550

Schacht, J. (1949). A Revaluation of Islamic Traditions. Cambridge University Press, 143–154.

Schacht, J. (1953). The Origins of Muhammadan Jurisprudence. The Claredon Press.

Schacht, J. (1982). An introduction to Islamic law. Clarendon Press.

Syahran, S., & Raziq, A. (2022). Komparasi Pemikiran Orientalis Tentang Perkembangan Hukum Islam (Goldziher, Joseph Schacht, Dan James Norman). Al-Azhar Islamic Law Review, 4(2), 132–144. https://doi.org/10.37146/ailrev.v4i2.185

Ulumuddin, U., Rike Uyunul Mukarromah, W., & Sumbullah, U. (2022). Joseph Schacht, Teori Skeptisisme Hadist dan Bantahan Sarjana Muslim Terhadapnya. El-Sunnah: Jurnal Kajian Hadis Dan Integrasi Ilmu, 3.

Yusuf, A. (n.d.). Kitāb al-Ᾱṡār. Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.