PERBEDAAN PETA PIKIRAN DAN PETA KONSEP TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR SISWA PADA EKSPONEN

Siti Salamah Br Ginting, Fitry Wahyuni

Abstract


Factors that affect students' mathematics learning outcomes include the lack of student interest in mathematics. Learning that does not have meaning and the teacher's teaching methods are still less diverse, causing a lack of student interest in learning mathematics. One of the meaningful learning is when students can make their own notes from their understanding while studying. This study aims to determine the differences in mathematics learning outcomes of students who are taught using the mind map method and students who are taught with the concept map method. This research was conducted at a private senior high school in Medan. This type of research is a quasi-experimental research design using randomize pretest-posttest control group design. The sampling technique uses purposive sampling by taking two experimental classes in class X high school. The instrument used to determine student learning outcomes on exponent material is a test in the form of an objective test of 15 items that have been declared valid and reliable. The results showed that the average student learning outcomes taught using the mind map method were higher than those taught with the concept map. From the results of this study teachers are expected to use the mind map method to improve student mathematics learning.

Keywords


Mathematics Learning Outcomes, Mind Map, Concept Map

Full Text:

PDF


DOI: https://doi.org/10.15548/mej.v6i1.3283
Abstract views : 114 times
PDF : 19 times

References


Alwi, M. (2014). Anak cerdas bahagia dengan pendidikan positif. Mizan.

Ardila, A., & Hartanto, S. (2017). Faktor yang mempengaruhi rendahnya hasil belajar matematika siswa MTS Iskandar Muda Batam. PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.33373/pythagoras.v6i2.966

Arikunto, S. (2007). Manajemen penelitian. Rineka Cipta.

Beavers, K. (2014). Mind and concept mapping. Tips and Trends, 1–4. https://acrl.ala.org/IS/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/2014winter.pdf

Bobbi De Porter, M. H. (2015). Quantum learning membiasakan belajar nyaman dan menyenangkan. Kaifa Learning.

Buzan, T. (2009). Buku pintar mind mapping. Gramedia.

Lorsbach, A & Tobin, K. (1992). Constructivism as a referent for Science Teaching. NARST research matters – to the Science Teacher.

Ningrum, D, W. (2015). Perbandingan hasil belajar fisika Siswa Kelas XI yang menggunakan metode pembelajaran peta pikiran (Mind Mapping) dan metode pembelajaran peta konsep (Concept Mapping). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika (E-Journal) SNF2015, Volume IV.

Sudjana. (2005). Metode statistika. Tarsito.

Trianto. (2007). Model-model pembelajaran inovatif berorientasi kontruktivistik (S. M.E (ed.)). Prestasi Pustaka.

Wardani, S. K. (2017). Pengaruh penggunaan peta konsep dalam pembelajaran matematika terhadap hasil belajar siswa. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

Zahara, E. (2018). Pengaruh strategi pembelajaran ekspositori berbasis peta pikiran (Mind Map) terhadap hasil belajar Matematika siswa kelas VIII SMP Swasta YPMA Medan tahun ajaran 2017/2018. Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Ruang Jurnal Program Studi Tadris Matematika
Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan
Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bojol Padang
email: mej.uinibpadang@gmail.com

 

Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-NonKomersial 4.0 Internasional.