1. Home
  2. Vol 4, No 1 (2018)
  3. Delfita

Pengembangan Modul Sistem Pencernaan Makanan Berbasis Literasi Sains Kelas VIII MTsN Padang Japaang

Rina Delfita, Muhammad Haviz, Nurhasnah Nurhasnah, Rifka Khaira Ulva

Abstract


This research is based on low scientific literacy of students. This is due to many factors, one of which is the textbook used less able to develop the scientific literacy students. Educators are required to provide teaching materials like a module that develops scientific literacy students. This type of research is Research and Development (R & D) model 4-D models by Thiagarajan and Sammel. Instruments used are questionnaire validity and questionnaire of practicality. The result show that the characteristics of prototype are the knowledge of science, the investigative nature of science, science as a way of thinking, interaction of science and technology, and society (scientific literacy contents). At process of design, a module of digestive system based scientific literacy develop based on the as reality and good practical education. Module have been categorized as valid based on expert judgment. The learning module have been categorized as practical based on the observation, respons es of teachers and learners. In conclusion, developing a module of digestive system based scientific literacy have the relevancy and internal consistency to develop scientific literacy students.

References


Darmiatun. (2013) Menyusun Modul Bahan Ajar untuk Persiapan Guru dalam Mengajar. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.

Fatkhurrohman, MA, Astuti, R. (2017) ‘Pengembangan Modul Fisika Dasar I Berbasis Literasi Sains’, Pancasakti Science Education Journal, 2(2), pp. 163–171.

Fives, H., Huebner, W., Birnbaum, A. S., & Nicolich, M. 2014. Developing a measure of scientific literacy for middle school students. Science Education, 98(4): 549-580.

El Islami, RAZ, Nahadi, Permanasari, A. (2015) ‘Hubungan literasi sains dan kepercayaan diri peserta didik pada konsep asam basa’, Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA, 1(1), pp. 16–25.

Johnson, W. (2016) ‘Why Engaging in Practices of Science Is Not Enough to Achieve Scientific Literacy’, The American Biology Teacher, 78(5), pp. 370–375. doi: 10.1525/abt.2016.78.5.370.

NGGS, L. S. (2013) Next Generation Science Standards: For State, By State. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.

Nieveen, N. (1999) ‘Prototyping to Reach Product Quality’, in Plomp, T; Nieveen, N; Gustafson, K; Branch, R.M; dan van den Akker, J. (eds) (ed.) Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training. London: Kluwer Academic Publisher.

Nieveen, N. (2007) ‘Formative Evaluation in Educational Design Research’, in Tjeerd and Nieveen, P. and N. (eds) The seminar conducted at the East China Normal University, Shanghai (PR China). Enschede: SLO Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development, p. 89–102.

OECD (2014) PISA 2012 Results : What Students Know and Can Do - Student Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science. Edisi Revi. United State: OECD Publishing.

Rakhmawan, A., Setiabudi, A. and Mudzakir, A. (2015) ‘Perancangan pembelajaran literasi sains berbasis inquiri pada kegiatan laborartorium’, Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA, 1(1), pp. 143–152.

Riduwan,(2010). Skala pengukuran variabel-variabel penelitian. Bandung : Alfabeta.

Rita, C Richey, James, D Klein and Wayne, A. N. (2002) ‘Developmental research: studies of instructional design and development’, in Jonassen, D. (ed.) Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. Washington: Association for Educational Communications and Technolog, p. 1101.

Sadler, TD, Zeidler, D. (2004) ‘The morality of socioscientific issues: Construal and resolution of genetic engineering dilemmas’, Science Education, 88(1), pp. 4–27.

Sanjaya, RWK, Mariadi, S. (2017) ‘Pengembangan modul berbasis bounded inquiri untuk meningkatkan literasi sains dimensi konten pada materi sistem pencernaan kelas xi’, Jurnal Inkuiri, 6(3), pp. 1–16.

Sugiyono.(2012).Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D.Bandung :Alfabeta.

Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S & Semmel, M. I. (1974) ‘Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Expectional Children’. Minneapolis, Minnesota: : Leadership Training Institute/Special Education, University of Minnesota.

Toharudin, U., Hendrawati, S., & Rustaman, A. (2011). Membangun literasi sains peserta didik. Bandung: Humaniora.

Tytler, R. (2007) Re-imagining Science Education Australian Education Review Re-imagining Science Education. Edited by ACER Press. Victoria.

Trianto,.(2014).ModelPembelajaranTerpadu.Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara

Usmeldi. (2016) ‘Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran Fisika Berbasis Riset dengan Pendekatan Scientific untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik’, Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 2, pp. 1–8.

Van den Akker, J. (1999) ‘Principles and Methods of Development Research’, in Plomp, T; Nieveen, N; Gustafson, K; Branch, R.M; dan van den Akker, J. (ed.) Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training. London. London: Kluwer Academic Publisher., p. 10.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.15548/nsc.v4i1.439

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Natural Science Journal