REVOLUSI ILMIAH THOMAS KUHN: PERUBAHAN PARADIGMA DAN IMPLIKASI DALAM BANGUNAN ILMU KEISLAMAN

Rahmat Effendi

Abstract


a lot of knowledge that produces a variety of technologies that can be used by humans. The value of truth is measured to what extent it can be observed through various researches in the scientific method. Profane science must be born systematically and methodically. The results of such paradigms give rise to anomalies among scientists and scientists. Faced with that there is an idea to build new science so as not to glorify a scientific method. This idea was sparked by the great scientist Thomas Kuhn. For him, there must be a revolution in the structure of modern science. Changing the old paradigm to the new paradigm must be done following the times (up to date). Furthermore, the building of science that has been built firmly in the West has been eroded by moral values and spirituality. What and how it relates to the building of Islamic science is a challenge for Muslims in taking the meaning of the scientific revolution. A paradigm shift is needed in every dimension of science. The focus of this research is Thomas Kuhn's scientific revolution which then drew the common thread over the building of Islamic science. This research is based on library research to reveal how modern science works and its relation to Islamic science.

Keywords


Thomas Kuhn, paradigm, science, revolution, Islamic science.

Full Text:

PDF


DOI: https://doi.org/10.15548/tajdid.v23i1.1693
Abstract views : 2338 times
PDF : 4774 times

References


Adib, Mohammad. 2018. Filsafat Ilmu: Ontologi, Epistemologi, Aksiologi, dan Logika Ilmu Pengetahuan. 3 ed. 3. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Almas, Afiq Fikri. 2018. “Sumbangan Paradigma Thomas S. Kuhn dalam Ilmu dan Pendidikan (Penerapan Metode Problem Based Learning dan Discovery Learning).” At-Tarbawi: Jurnal Kajian Kependidikan Islam 3 (1): 89.

https://doi.org/10.22515/attarbawi.v3i1.1147.

Amaliyah, Aam. 2016. “Perkembangan Paradigma Ilmu Menurut Tinjauan Teori Thomas Khun.” At-Ta’lim : Media Informasi Pendidikan Islam 15 (2): 407–21.

https://doi.org/10.29300/attalim.v15i2.533.

Bagus, Lorens. 2005. Kamus Filsafat. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Bakhtiar, Amsal. 2013. Filsafat Ilmu. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Bird, Alexander. 2014. Thomas Kuhn. London and New York: Routledge.

Damayanti, Septi Nur, dan Hamka Mujahid Ma’ruf. 2018. “Epistemologi Saintifik Thomas S. Kuhn Terhadap Munculnya Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial.” Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia 1 (3): 120–27.

https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v1i3.16192.

Fuller, Steve. 2000. Thomas Kuhn: A Philosophical History for Our Times. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

Gie, The Liang. 1998. Lintasan Sejarah Ilmu. Yogyakarta: PUBIB.

Karim, Abdul. 2014. “Sejarah Perkembangan Ilmu Pengetahuan.” FIKRAH 2 (2). https://doi.org/10.21043/fikrah.v2i2.563.

Kindi, Vasso, dan Theodore Arabatzis. 2012. Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Revisited. New York and London: Routledge.

Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Latief, Imam Zamroni. 2014. “Islam Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan.” Islamuna: Jurnal Studi Islam 1 (2).

https://doi.org/10.19105/islamuna.v1i2.564.

Mahzar, Armahedi. 2004. Revolusi Integralisme Islam: Merumuskan Paradigma Sains Dan Teknologi Islami. Bandung: Mizan.

Mufid, Fathul. 2013. “Integrasi Ilmu-ilmu Islam.” Equilibrium 1 (1): 55–71. https://doi.org/10.21043/equilibrium.v1i1.200.

Mustaring, Mustaring. 2014. “Revolusi Ilmu Pengetahuan Dan Relevansinya Terhadap Pembaruan Hukum Islam.” DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum 12 (1): 13–23.

Nelvawita, Nelvawita. 2017. “Akselerasi Perkembangan Ilmu Keislaman (Suatu Analisis Filosofis).” POTENSIA: Jurnal Kependidikan Islam 3 (2): 242–55.

https://doi.org/10.24014/potensia.v3i2.4103.

Nurkhalis, Nurkhalis. 2012. “Konstruksi Teori Paradigma Thomas S. Kuhn.” Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura 11 (2): 79–99.

https://doi.org/10.22373/jiif.v11i2.55.

Putra, Afriadi. 2015. “Epistemologi Revolusi Ilmiah Thomas Kuhn Dan Relevansinya Bagi Studi Al-Qur’an.” Refleksi: Jurnal Filsafat Dan Pemikiran Islam 15 (1): 1–15.

https://doi.org/10.14421/ref.2015.%x.

Sabila, Nur Akhda. 2019. “Paradigma dan Revolusi Ilmiah Thomas S. Kuhn (Aspek Sosiologis, Antropologis, dan Historis dari Ilmu Pengetahuan).” Zawiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam 5 (1): 80–97.

https://doi.org/10.31332/zjpi.v5i1.1318.

Saputra, Riki. 2020. “Kajian al-Islam dan Ke-Muhammadiyahan (AIK) Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Barat Dalam Perspektif Filsafat Ilmu Ke-Islaman.” Menara Ilmu 14 (1).

https://doi.org/10.31869/mi.v14i1.1869.

Sharrock, Wes, dan Rupert Read. 2002. Kuhn: Philosopher of Scientific Revolutions. Malden: Polity Press and Blackwell.

Shomiyatun, Shomiyatun. 2019. “Konsep Ilmu Dalam Pandangan Islam.” Al-Misbah (Jurnal Islamic Studies) 5 (1): 15–33.

https://doi.org/10.26555/almisbah.v5i1.164.

Soler, Léna, Howard Sankey, dan Paul Hoyningen-Huene. 2008. Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison: Stabilities, Ruptures, Incommensurabilities? The Netherlands: Springer Science & Business Media.

Trisakti, Sonjoruri Budiani. 2008. “Thomas Kuhn Dan Tradisi-Inovasi Dalam Langkah Metodologis Riset Ilmiah.” Jurnal Filsafat

(3): 223–40. https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.3526.

Ulya, Inayatul, dan Nuskhan Abid. 2015. “Pemikiran Thomas Kuhn Dan Relevansinya Terhadap Keilmuan Islam.” FIKRAH 3 (2): 249–76. https://doi.org/10.21043/fikrah.v3i2.1797.

Wahyuni, Fitri. 2018. “Islamisasi Ilmu Pengetahuan (Upaya Mengurai Dikotomi Ilmu Pengetahuan Dalam Islam).” QALAMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Agama 10 (02).

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3559251.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Fakultas Ushuluddin Dan Studi Agama, UIN Imam Bonjol Padang
Jl. Prof. Mahmud Yunus No.1, Lubuk Lintah, Kuranji. 
Kota Padang, Sumatera Barat, 25153
Handphone: +62 8126615808
E-mail: tajdid@uinib.ac.id