Comparison of the Criteria for the Validity of Hadith in the View of the Khawarij and Sunni

Muhid Muhid, Syabrowi Syabrowi, Andris Nurita

Abstract


This article tries to identify the ideas of the Khawarij and Sunni in the criteria for the validity of hadith. So far, hawarij is known as a group in which there are people who left the ranks of 'Ali ibn Abu Talib after the tahkim (arbitration) incident.dTheir understanding of religion tends to be textual both in interpreting verses or understanding the Prophet's hadith. In its development, they helped formulate the criteria for the validity of the hadith as the Sunnis. Through this study the author tries to analyze how the differences and similarities in the concept of authenticity of hadith according to the Khawarij and Sunnis. In addition to aiming to enrich scientific treasures in the field of hadith science, this study also aims to explore further whether the concept coined by the Khawarij in measuring the validity of the hadith contains controversy or not when compared to the concept of the Sunnis. This methode of research is a qualitative research that is descriptive analysis. Sources of data in the form of previous studies or references in the form of books and books which contain related discussions. This study shows that in general the criteria for the validity of hadith according to the Khawarij are the same as the criteria for the validity of hadith according to the Sunnis.. They are also inconsistent in accepting the hadith.

Keywords


Khawarij, Sunni, validity, hadith

Full Text:

PDF


DOI: https://doi.org/10.15548/turast.v11i2.5982
Abstract views : 126 times
PDF : 27 times

References


Amin, A. (t.th) al-Ahadits al-Musnadah al-Waridah fi al-Khawarij wa Shifatihim. T.tp: Maktabah al-Rusyd.

Aidan Ahmad al-Dailami, M. (2015). Al-Shahabah wa Makanatuhum ‘Inda al-Muslimin. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Bus‘idi, S. (1998). Ruwwah al-Hadith ‘Inda al-‘Ibadiyyah. Tesis: Universitas Alu Bait.

Depag Republik Indonesia. (2015). Alquran dan Terjemahannya. Jakarta: DKU print.

Faisal, A. (1998). Qudumu Kataib al-Jihad li Gazwi Ahl al-Zindiqah wa Ilhad fi Masail al-I‘tiqad. Saudi Arabia: Dar al-Sami‘i.

Ghazali. (t.th). al-Mustafa min ‘Ilm al-Usul. Beirut: Muassasat al-Risalah.

Hanbal, A. (2001). Musnad Ahmad. T.tp: Muassasah al-Risalah.

Hilali, S. (2007). Keabsahan Hadis Ahad dalam Aqidah dan Hukum. Terj. Badru Salam, Roni Mahmuddin). Bogor: Pustaka Ulil Albab.

Isma‘il, M. (1995). Kaedah Kesahihan Sanad Hadis. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang.

Khathib, M. (2006). Ushul al-Hadits ‘Ulumuhu wa Mushthalatuhu. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr.

Kulsum, U. (2020). Konstalasi Islam Wasathiyah. Journal of Islamic Civiliztion. Vol. 2. No. I.

Kalsum Hasibuan, U. Suryadinata, S. (2018). Telaah Kitab Al-Sunnah Qabla Tadwin Karya M. Ajjaj Al-Khatib. Jurnal Ushuluna. Vo. 4. No. 2. Desember.

Musthafa, N. (2012). Oposisi Islam. Yogyakarta: LKIS.

Nasution, H. (2012). Teologi Islam. (Aliran-aliran Sejarah Analisa Perbandingan). Jakarta: UI Pres.

Nikmah, S. (2019). Epistemologi Hadis Dalam Perspektif Kelompok Syiah dan Khawarij. Jurnal Al-Mabhats. Vol. 4. No. 2.

Syahrastani, M. (2006). Al-Milal wa al-Nihal, Terj. Surabaya: Ibna Ilmu.

Saniah, M. Sidik, A. (2020). Pemikiran Khawarij: (Studi Historis Geneologis Pemikiran Islam). Jurnal Rusydiah. Vol. 1. No. 1. Juni.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Syabrowi, Dkk..

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Editorial Office
Turast: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian
Copyright©. Pusat Penelitian dan Publikasi Ilmiah
Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian (LPPM), Gedung Rektorat Lantai I
Kampus III Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang - All rights reserved
Email: lp2m@uinib.ac.id