Application Semiotics Narrative Greimas About Narration The story of Musa and Khidir

Bilfahmi Putra, Imamul Muttaqin, Toni Markos

Abstract


Stories of the prophets occupy important in the Qur’an. Story the meeting of Prophet Musa and Khidir, which displays plot conflict problematic to have elements implied, among other things caused second figure main allegedly to do action controversial. Studying this to find structure accounting reveals essentially the story of Musa and Khidir in the Qur'an based on correlation between patterns and structure narration. Article this uses method qualitative with type study literature with approach analysis semiotics AJ Greimas model narrative. Research results: First, structure the narrative of Musa and Khidir found in QS. Al- Kahf verses 62- 80 consists of six segments that have structure actant. From the whole actant every segment, found actant main; (a) senders: Allah 's command to Musa, (b) subject: Musa, (c) receive: Musa, (d) object: Studying with Khidir, (e) helper: agreement early, (f) opposite: difference paradigm. Structure functional narrative consists of three stages: (1) situation beginning: tell beginning the journey of Musa and his guards, (2) transformation: outlines conflict During study to Khidir, (3) situation ends narrate farewell of Musa and Khidir. Second, through analysis of the structure of the mind, I found a symptom of desire from Musa to do Allah 's command. The conflict happened because there exists a different paradigm epistemological Among both.

Keywords


Semiotics narrative, AJ Greimas, The Story of Prophet Musa and Khidir

Full Text:

PDF


DOI: https://doi.org/10.15548/ju.v11i2.5116
Abstract views : 169 times
PDF : 177 times

References


Abdullah, Amin. (1996). Studi Agama Normativitas atau Historisitas, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Ahmadi, Abu. (2009). Psikologi Umum Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. (1998). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta,.

Awais, Ammar. (2017). Lessons from The Stories of The Quran UK: Independent Published by Ammar Awais.

Badrudin. (2015). Pengantar Ilmu Tasawuf, Serang: Putri Kartika Banjarsari.

Bakker, Anton dan Achmad Charris Zubair. (1990). Metodologi Penelitian Filsafat, Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Chirzin, Muhammad. (1998). Al Qur’an & Ulumul Qur’an Yogyakarta: Dhana Bhakti Prima Yasa.

Furchan, Arief dan Agus Maimun. (2005). Study Tokoh: Metode Penelitian Mengenai Tokoh, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Greimas, A.J. (1983). Structural Semantics: An Attempt at a Method, Diterjemahkan oleh Ronald Schleifer, London: University of Nebraska Press.

Hawkes, Terence. (2003). Structuralism and Semiotics, London: Routledge.

Imron, Ali dan Farida. (2017). Pengkajian Sastra: Teori dan Aplikasi, Surakarta: CV. Djiwa Amarta Press.

Kaelan. (2010). Metode Penelitian Agama Kualitatif Interdisipliner, Yogyakarta: Paradigma.

Katsir, Ibn. (2007). Qashashul Anbiya, diterjemahkan Abu Huzaifah, Jakarta: Pustaka As-Sunnah.

______. (2003). Tafsir Ibn Katsir Jilid 5, terj. M. Abdul Ghofar EM & Abdul Mu’thi, Bogor: Pusataka Imam al-Syafi’i.

Quthb, Sayyid. (t.th). Al-Taswir Al-Fanni fii Al-Qur’an Kairo: Daar al-Ma’aarif.

______. (2004). Indahnya Al-Qur’an Berkisah, terj. Fathurrahman Abdul Hamid, Jakarta: Gema Insani.

Rachman, Budhy Muawar. (2011). Ensiklopedi Nurcholis Madjid; Pemikiran Islam Di Kanvas Peradaban Jakarta: Democracy Project Yayasan Abad Demokrasi.

santosa, Puji. (2015). Metodologi Penelitian Sastra, Yogyakarta: Azzagrafika.

Setiawan, M. Nur Kholis. (2005). Al-Qur’an Kitab Sastra Terbesar Yogyakarta: eLSAQ Press.

Shihab, M. Quraish. (1994). Membumikan Al-Qur’an: Fungsi Dan Peran Wahyu Dalam Kehidupan Masyarakat. Bandung: Mizan.

______. (2002). Tafsir Al-Mishbah: Pesan Kesan dan Keserasian Al-Qur’an, Jakarta: Lentera Hati.

Spaulding, Amy E. (2011). The Art of Storytelling, (United Kingdom: The Scarecrow Press.

Tyson, Lois. (2006). Critical Theory Today, London: Routledge.

Affani, Syukron. (2017). “Rekontruksi Kisah Nabi Musa dalam Al-Qur’an: Studi Perbandingan dengan Perjanjian Lama”, al-Ahkam, Vol. 12, No. 1.

Arif, Mahmud. (2002). “Pertautan Epistemologi Bayani dan Pendidikan Islam”, Al-Jami’ah, Vol.40, No.1.

Faisol, M. (2017). “ Interpretasi Kisah Musa Perspektif Naratologi Al-Qur’an”, ISLAMICA: Jurnal Studi Islam, Vol. 11, No. 2.

Hajar, Rofiqoh Ibnu. (2017). “Kisah-Kisah (Qasas) Dalam Al-Qur’an Perspektif I’jaz,” QOF 1, 1.

Hasyim, Mochamad. (2018). “Epistemologi Islam (Bayani, Burhani, Irfani)”, Jurnal Murabbi, Vol. 3, No. 2.

Karnanta, Kukuh Yudha. (2015). “Struktural dan Semantik: Teropong Strukturalisme dan Aplikasi Teori Naratif A.J. Greimas”, Jurnal Atavisme, Vol. 18.

Kusuma, Wira Hadi. (2018). “Epistemologi Bayani, Irfani dan Burhani Al-Jabiri dan Relevansinya Bagi Studi Agama Untuk Resolusi Konflik dan Peacebuilding”, Syiar, Vol. 18, No. 1.

Tarasti, Eero. (2017). “The semiotics of A. J. Greimas: A European Intellectual Heritage Seen from The Inside and The Outside”, Sign Systems Studies, 45(1/2).

Wahyudi, Andri. (2015). “Konflik, Konsep, Teori dan Permasalahan”, jurnal publiciana, Vol.8, No 1.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Prodi Ilmu Al-Qur`an dan Tafsir, Fakultas Ushuluddin Dan Studi Agama, UIN Imam Bonjol Padang
Jl. Sungai Bangek, Kel. Balai Gadang, Kec. Koto Tangah. 
Kota Padang, Sumatera Barat, 25171
E-mail: jurnal-ulunnuha@uinib.ac.id



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.