Perbedaan Nilai Dan Dilema Etis Dalam Pendampingan Psikologis Pada Konteks Keberagaman
Abstract
Cross-cultural counseling is a process of interaction between counselors and clients who come from different cultural backgrounds. This process requires a deep understanding of the diversity of values, norms, and beliefs. These cultural differences often give rise to complex and ethically challenging value conflicts. This article aims to examine value conflicts and ethical challenges in cross-cultural counseling using This study uses a qualitative method with a systematic literature study approach. Data were obtained from various scientific literature journals, books, and research reports in the last five years. The results of the study indicate that conflicts often arise when counselors apply their personal value framework to clients from other cultures, or when the client's cultural values are not in line with universal ethical principles in counseling practice. The dominant ethical challenges include issues of confidentiality, client autonomy, counselor cultural competence, and power imbalances in counseling relationships. Ethical dilemmas also often occur when counselors must choose between respecting the client's cultural values or following the professional code of ethics. This study emphasizes the importance of cross-cultural competence training and the development of a contextual and flexible ethical framework. A complete understanding of value conflicts and ethical challenges is an important foundation in building cross-cultural counseling practices that are ethical, inclusive, and responsive to client diversity.
Keywords: Counseling, cross-cultural, ethics, conflict, values, ethical
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Asbi, Widya Anggriani Putri, Annisa, & Sri Rezeki. (2024). Peran Nilai Budaya dalamKomunikasi Konseling Lintas Budaya. Jurnal Pendidikan, Ilmu Sosial, Dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 4(1), 1284–1291. https://jurnal.permapendis-sumut.org/index.php/edusociety
Choiri, M. F., Karneli, Y., Studi, P., & Padang, U. N. (2024). Perspektif Filsafat Ilmu Untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Multikultural Konselor. 8, 43339–43349.
Firdaus, M. D., Kumariaksy, F. A., & Habsy, B. A. (2025). Memahami Peran Etika dan Kompetensi Konselor dalam Konseling Multibudaya. Katalis Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Matematika, 2(2), 265–279. https://journal.lpkd.or.id/index.php/Katalis
Murdianto. (2018). Stereotipe , Prasangka dan Resistensinya (Studi Kasus pada Etnis Madura dan Tionghoa di Indonesia). Qalamuna, 10(2), 137–160.
Naraswari, I. A. M. D., Suarni, N. K., & Dharsana, I. K. (2023). Kode etik dan penyimpangan budaya dalam konseling: studi literatur. Jurnal EDUCATIO: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 9(1), 570. https://doi.org/10.29210/1202322998
Ningsih, R., Aryani, E., Laras, P. B., & Hadi, A. (2022). Pengembangan Kompetensi Multikultural Calon Konselor. TERAPUTIK: Jurnal Bimbingan Dan Konseling, 5(3), 305–310. https://doi.org/10.26539/teraputik.53854
Rahmi, A., Neviyarni, & Netrawati. (2022). Kompetensi Multibudaya Konselor dalam Konseling Kelompok Sebagai Upaya Mengatasi Bias Budaya. Jurnal Bimbingan Dan Konseling Islam, 3(1), 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.32505/syifaulqulub.v3i1.5012
Rifani, E., Maulina, N., & Ummah, F. S. (2022). Indonesian Journal of Guidance and Counseling : Theory and Application Studi Literatur : kompetensi multikultural guru BK dalam mendukung keberhasilan layanan konseling multikultural. Indonesian Journal Of Guidance and Counseling: Theory and Application, 11(2), 196–204.
Sari, A. F. (2023). Karakteristik Kepribadian Konselor Ideal Dalam Konseling Multikultural. Jurnal Bimbingan Penyuluhan Islam, 5(2), 252–266. https://doi.org/10.32332/jbpi.v5i2.7958
Simon, I. M., & Hidayat, R. R. (2022). Perbedaan Pengetahuan dan Kesadaran Multikultural Mahasiswa Calon Konselor dua LPTK Indonesia. Jurnal Psikoedukasi Dan Konseling, 6(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.20961/jpk.v6i1.62497
Widodo, A., Rahmad, A., & Rachman, E. S. (2023). Konsep Konseling Lintas Budaya. Jurnal Al-Irsyad: Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling Islam, 4(2), 271–284. https://doi.org/10.24952/bki.v4i2.6481
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15548/jbki.v16i02.13036
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.








