AN ANALYSIS OF ILLOCUTIONARY ACTS IN THE SLOGANS OF THE AIRLINE ADVERTISEMENTS

Benny Mega Wati, Ulil Amri

Abstract


Abstract: This research describes the types of illocutionary acts found in the slogans of airplane advertisements on the internet. Researchers analyzed the applications of illocutionary forms that are widely used in airplane slogans. Data was collected by downloading airplane advertising slogans on the internet. The data were analyzed using the pragmatic characteristic method. The theory used is the types of illocutionary acts theory by Searle (1993) and Hymes (1972) which are associated with the types of sentences and the context of an utterance. Data analysis was presented descriptively. Research shows that the type of speech act that is mostly used in airplane advertisements is the type of commissive action and directive action (66.6%). The researcher concluded that the advertisers conveyed their ideas by using words that meant that passengers who read the advertisements did something that was expected by the advertisers and were limited by an action in the future. They also use a different form of the word from the word itself. Apart from that, the types of speech acts that are also used are the types of assertive speech acts, the types of expressive speech acts, and the types of speech acts that are declared.


Key words: pragmatics, speech acts, illucotionary acts, airlines advertisement



Abstract views : 497 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) : 391 times

References


Adegoju. A. (2005). A Rherorical Analysis of the Discourse of Advertising Herbal Medicine in Southwestern Nigeria. http://www.linguistik-online.de/33_08/adegoju.pdf

Ahmed. N. (1996). Cross-Cultural Analysis of Advertising from the United States and India. Mississippi: University of Southern Mississippi. http://www.bookpump.com/dps/pdf-b/1120842b.pdf

Austin, J.L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Griffiths, Patrick. 2006. An Introduction to English Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd.

Hymes, D. (1972). Models of the Interaction of Language in Social Life. In Renkema, Jan. 1993. Disscourse Studies: An Introduction Textbook. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Kasali, R. (1995). Advertising Management. Jakarta: Graffiti

Kreidler, C.W. (1998). Introducing English Semantics. New York: Routledge

Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman

Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Parker, F. (1986). Linguistics for Non Linguistic. London: Taylor & Francais, Ltd

Pedro A.et.al. (2001). Persuasion and advertising English: Metadiscourse in slogans and headlines. Online Journal of Pragmatics, 1291-1307. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216601800266

Sudaryanto. (1993). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana

Searle, J.R. (1969). The Philosophy of Language. London: Cambridge University Press

Schiffrin, D. (1994). Approaches to Discourse. Oxford UK and Cambridge USA: Blackwell

Stalnaker, R. C. 1999.Context and Content. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wijana, I. D.P. (1996). Dasar Dasar Pragmatik. Yogyakarta

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics: An Introduction to Language Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


UPT Pengembangan Bahasa, Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang Jl. M. Yunus No. 1, Lubuk Lintah, Kuranji. Kota Padang, Sumatera Barat 25153