Analisis Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Terhadap Penerimaan Mahasiswa Pada Portal Akademik

Raju Wandira, Innamul Ikwana

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of academic information systems among students. Seeing how student admissions use academic information systems for future improvements. This study uses the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) method which is related to the content design and content quality of academic information systems. Data collection from this study was carried out by using a questionnaire. The questionnaire was filled in by ≥152 respondents consisting of students from various faculties and departments and at different semester levels. By obtaining construct reliability cut off ≥ 0.7 and Average Variance Extracted with cut off ≥ 0.5, the indicator value has good internal consistency. From the results of the analysis conducted, it shows that the significant influence of content quality on content design, quality, and content design on the ease and benefits felt by students. Although there is no significant correlation between ease of use of the portal and its perceived benefits.

Keywords


Academic portal; TAM

Full Text:

PDF


DOI: https://doi.org/10.15548/isrj.v1i01.1997
Abstract views : 584 times
PDF : 436 times

References


M. Von Davier, E. Gonzalez, I. Kirsch, and K. Yamamoto, The Role of International Large-Scale Assessments: Perspective from Technology, Economy, and Educational Research. Springer Science Business Media.

M. Agnes, L. Jola, and S. Gaspersz, “Academic Information System for Student (Case Study: Victory University of Sorong),” Int. J. Comput. Appl., vol. 180, no. 43, pp. 26–33, 2018, doi: 10.5120/ijca2018917134.

N. Chudowsky and J. W. Pellegrino, “Large-Scale Assessments That Support Learning: What Will It Take?,” Theory Pract., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 75–83, 2003, doi: 10.1353/tip.2003.0002.

F. Pai and K. Huang, “Technological Forecasting & Social Change Applying the Technology Acceptance Model to the introduction of healthcare information systems,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 650–660, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.11.007.

W. R. King and J. He, “A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model,” Inf. Manag., vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 740–755, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003.

P. Legris, J. Ingham, and P. Collerette, “Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model,” Inf. Manag., vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 191–204, 2003, doi: 10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00143-4.

R. Rauniar, G. Rawski, J. Yang, and B. Johnson, “Technology acceptance model (TAM) and social media usage: An empirical study on Facebook,” J. Enterp. Inf. Manag., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 6–30, 2014, doi: 10.1108/JEIM-04-2012-0011.

N. Fathema, D. Shannon, and M. Ross, “Expanding The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to Examine Faculty Use of Learning Management Systems (LMSs) In Higher Education Institutions,” J. Adv. Manag. Sci., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 210–232, 2015, doi: 10.12720/joams.4.2.92-97.

T. Teo, Ö. F. Ursavaş, and E. Bahçekapili, “Efficiency of the technology acceptance model to explain pre-service teachers’ intention to use technology: A Turkish study,” Campus-Wide Information Systems, vol. 28, no. 2. pp. 93–101, 2011, doi: 10.1108/10650741111117798.

W. W. M. Ã, R. Andersson, and K. Streith, “Examining user acceptance of computer technology : an empirical study of student teachers,” pp. 387–395, 2005.

L. Sclerotinia and W. Andreea-ioana, “Exploring Students Acceptance Of E-Learning Using Technology Acceptance Model In Jordania Universities,” vol. 9, no. 2, p. 2, 2017.

F. D. Davis, “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS Q. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–339, 1989, doi: 10.2307/249008.

J. F.D.Davis, “A Technology Acceptance Model For Empirically Testing New End User Informastion System: Theory and Results,” Science, vol. 146, no. 3652, pp. 1648–54, 1985.

E. Fatmawati, “Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) untuk Menganalisis Penerimaan Terasap Sistem Informasi Perpustakaan,” J. Iqra, vol. 09, no. 01, pp. 1–13, 2015.

F. Sayekti and P. Putarta, “Penerapan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Dalam Pengujian Model Penerimaan Sistem Informasi Keuangan Daerah,” J. Manaj. Teor. dan Terap., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 196–209, 2016.

F. D. Davis, R. P. Bagozzi, and P. R. Warshaw, “User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two Theoretical Models,” Manage. Sci., vol. 35`, no. 8, pp. 982–1003, 1989, doi: 10.1088/2058-7058/30/1/43.

B. H. Sheppard, J. Hartwick, and P. R. Warshaw, “The Theory of Reasoned Action: A Meta-Analysis of Past Research with Recommendations for Modifications and Future Research,” J. Consum. Res., vol. 15, no. 3, p. 325, 1988, doi: 10.1086/209170.

Y. C. Lee, “An empirical investigation into factors influencing the adoption of an e-learning system,” vol. Vol. 30, no. Unit 07, pp. 517–541, 2006, doi: 10.1108/14684520610706406.

Y. M. Cheng, “Effects of quality antecedents on e-learning acceptance,” Internet Res., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 361–390, 2012, doi: 10.1108/10662241211235699.

M. A. Almaiah, M. A. Jalil, and M. Man, “Extending the TAM to examine the effects of quality features on mobile learning acceptance,” J. Comput. Educ., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 453–485, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s40692-016-0074-1.

D. Alarcón, J. A. Sánchez, and U. P. De Olavide, “Assessing convergent and discriminant validity in the ADHD-R IV rating scale : User-written commands for Average Variance Extracted ( AVE ), Composite Reliability ( CR ), and Heterotrait-Monotrait ratio of correlations ( HTMT ).,” Spanish STATA Meet. 2015, pp. 1–39, 2015.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Gedung Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi 
Kampus III Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang
Sungai Bangek, Kec. Koto Tangah, Kota Padang, Sumatera Barat

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.