KEBEBASAN DAN TANGGUNG JAWAB DALAM TEOLOGI QADARIYAH: ANALISIS NORMATIF DAN RELEVANSINYA DI ERA MODERN
Abstract
This research aims to review the teachings of Qadariyah in relation to the concept of human freedom and responsibility through the perspective of Islamic normative theology. The main problem studied is how Qadariyah's view of free will and human moral responsibility can be understood proportionately based on the basic norms of the Islamic faith, and the extent to which these teachings are relevant in answering ethical and social problems in the modern era. This research uses a qualitative approach with library research and content analysis. Primary sources come from the book al-Milal wa al-Nihal, the Qur'an, and Hadith, while secondary sources come from contemporary literature on Islamic theology and the philosophy of freedom. The results of the study show that the doctrine of Qadariyah emphasizes the importance of a balance between human freedom and moral responsibility as a form of divine justice. This teaching remains relevant to face the moral and spiritual challenges of modern society which often experiences a crisis of responsibility due to a misinterpretation of the concept of freedom. This research contributes to enriching the study of Islamic theology by emphasizing the need for a synthesis between classical teachings and contemporary contexts through normative theological frameworks, thus providing a new normative e-theological perspective on how classical doctrine can address modern ethical issues.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdillah, S. (2017) Mazhab Jabariyah dan Qadariyah: Sejarah, Perkembangan, Pemikiran, dan Polemiknya. DIVA PRESS.
Abubakar, A. and Arsyad, A. (2024) ‘Diskursus Teologi Qadariyah dan Jabariyah: Tawakal dalam Tinjauan Filosofis dan Survey Masyarakat Modern’, FiTUA: Jurnal Studi Islam, 5(2), pp. 198–216.
Al-Ghurabi, A.M. (1959) Ta [’rikh Al-Firaq Al-Islamiyyah. Muhammad’Ali [Subi [h].
Amin, H.N. (2004) ‘Pemikiran Teologi Islam Modern’.
Anwar, S.S. (2020) Ilmu Kalam (Khazanah Intelektual Pemikiran dalam Islam). PT. Indragiri Dot Com.
Al Anwari, A.Z.M. et al. (2024) ‘Pandangan Jabariyah dan Qadariyah Pengaruhnya Terhadap Pemikiran Muslim Modern’, Jurnal Intelek Dan Cendikiawan Nusantara, 1(6), pp. 11057–11069.
Arifin, M. (2021) Teologi Rasional Perspektif Pemikiran Harun Nasution. Lembaga Kajian Konstitusi Indonesia (LKKI) Fakultas Syari’ah dan Hukum UIN ….
Assegaf, A. (2005) Studi Islam kontekstual: elaborasi paradigma baru muslim kaffah. Gama Media.
Bakker, A. and Zubair, A.C. (1990) Metodologi Penelitian Filsafat. Yogyakarrta: KANISISUS.
Binsasi, N.A. (2024) ‘Kebebasan dan kesetaraan sebagai dua nilai sosial dasar masyarakat modern (Sebuah studi aksiologi tentang demokrasi)’, Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Sigli, 7(1), pp. 675–686.
Fauzi, F. (2023) ‘Pendekatan Normatif Dan Teologis Dalam Pengembangan Studi Islam’, Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 3(6), pp. 10106–10119.
Hasbi, M. (2015) ‘Ilmu Kalam memotret berbagai aliran teologi dalam islam’. Trustmedia Publishing.
Jatnika, M.H.I. and Syauqi, M.R.S. (2025) ‘Konsep Kebebasan Manusia menurut Wahbah Az-Zuhaili dalam Tafsir al-Munir: Kajian terhadap Humanisme Barat’, Mustaneer: Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 1(2), pp. 222–240.
Khafifuddin, K. (2024) ‘Perbuatan Manusia Dalam Al-QurAn (Studi Komparatif Ayat-Ayat Perbuatan Manusia Dalam Tafsir Al-KasysyâF Dan Tafsir MafâTih Al-Gaib)’. Institut PTIQ Jakarta.
Lutfi, M.F. (2020) ‘Analisis Atas Teologi Antara Kebebasan dan Keterpaksaan Studi Pemkiran M. Baharuddin’. UIN Raden Intan Lampung.
Mansur, A. and Saputra, A. (2019) ‘Konsep Keadilan Tuhan: Studi Pemikiran Teologi Abu Mansur al-Maturidi’, Al-Fikra: Jurnal Ilmiah Keislaman, 17(2), pp. 339–360.
Martono, N. (2010) Metode penelitian kuantitatif: Analisis Isi dan Analisis Data Sekunder (sampel halaman gratis). RajaGrafindo Persada.
Mas’ud, F. et al. (2025) ‘Etika Dalam Media Sosial Antara Kebebasan Ekspresi Dan Tanggung Jawab Digital’, Jimmi: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Multidisiplin, 2(2), pp. 235–246.
Nafiah, Q. and Qurba, S.N. (2025) ‘Telaah Kritis terhadap Gagasan Kebebasan Manusia dalam Tafsir Surah al-Kahf Ayat 29 Perspektif al-Nasafī’, Qur’anic Interpretation Journal, 2(1), pp. 1–18.
Nasution, H. (2008) ‘Teologi Islam: aliran-aliran sejarah analisa perbandingan’.
Nurdin, A. and Abbas, A.F. (2022) Sejarah Pemikiran Islam. Amzah.
Raharjo, M.A., Aderus, A. and Harun, H. (2025) ‘Kebebasan Manusia dalam Berkehendak dan Berbuat: Analisis Persoalan Klasik dalam Konteks Kehidupan Berbangsa di Indonesia’, ALFIHRIS: Jurnal Inspirasi Pendidikan, 3(1), pp. 203–215.
Ramadhani, H., Mukti, A. and Dahlan, Z. (2022) ‘Implikasi Doktrin Qadariyah dan Jabariyah Dalam Pembangunan Karakter Sosial’, GOVERNANCE: Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Politik Lokal dan Pembangunan, 8(3).
Sa’diyah, F. and Sani, A. (2023) ‘Doktrin qadar dalam Islam: Memahami dinamika antara free will dan determinisme’, ISME: Journal of Islamic Studies and Multidisciplinary Research, 1(2), pp. 11–23.
Shobirin, M., Rosyadi, R.N. and Sari, E.F. (2025) Tantangan Dan Problematika Masyarakat Modern. Cahya Ghani Recovery.
Sidik, S. (2016) ‘Refleksi paham jabariyah dan qadariyah’, Rausyan Fikr: Jurnal Ilmu Studi Ushuluddin dan Filsafat, 12(2), pp. 273–287.
Silalahi, U.P.C. (2024) ‘Disposisi, Kehendak Bebas, dan Kontingensi’, Studia Philosophica et Theologica, 24(2), pp. 212–230.
Sugiyono, S. (2007) Metode Penelitian kualitatif, kuantitatif dan R&D, Bandung Alf.
Sulaeman, Y. and Almisri, Z. (2023) ‘Teologi Asy’ariyah: Sejarah dan Pemikirannya’, El-Adabi: Jurnal Studi Islam, 2(1), pp. 25–44.
Syahrastani, A.F.M. ibn ‘Abd K. (2016) AL-Milal wa Nihal. Beirut: Dār al-Ma‘rifah.
Tutupary, V. (2016) ‘Kebebasan kehendak (free will) David Ray Griffin dalam perspektif filsafat agama’, Jurnal Filsafat [Preprint].
Zuhri, A.M. (2022) Teologi Islam klasik dan kontemporer. Nawa Litera Publishing.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15548/ja.v17i2.12796
Refbacks
Faklutas Ushuluddin dan Studi Agama, UIN Imam Bonjol Padang
Kampus III Sungai Bangek, Kelurahan Balai Gadang, Kecamatan Koto Tangah, Kota Padang. Kode pos 25171
Tlp/Fax:
Handphone:
E-mail: [email protected]

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
_(2).jpg)

