Measurement of the Cognitive Domain Using HOTs in Indonesian Class VIII SMP Iskandar Said

Raiza Aulia, Pramesti Pradna Paramita

Abstract


The cognitive domain in Bloom's Taxonomy serves as a framework for categorizing educational goals, curriculum and designing assessments. After a journey of fifty years, Bloom was revised by Kratwohl and Anderson to produce (1) remember, (2) understand, (3) apply, (4) analyze, (5) evaluate, and (6) create. This study aims to describe the implementation of measurement through the cognitive domain. This study uses a quantitative approach, because this research approach can describe cognitive learning outcomes into numbers so that it is easy to analyze the data statistically. The subjects in this study were seventh grade students of SMP Iskandar Said Surabaya. The variable in this study is the cognitive domain. The method or technique of data collection is using the question method or in the form of a test. While the instruments used in this research are in the form of tests to measure the ability of the beginning or end of learning, and observations during the learning process. To measure the cognitive domain using a measuring instrument in the form of a multiple choice test. Where from the results of 40 cognitive questions given to seventh grade students of SMP Iskandar Said Surabaya in Indonesian subjects, 7 questions were retained, 18 questions were revised, and 15 questions were discarded.

Keywords


HOTs; Cognitive; Bahasa Indonesia



DOI: https://doi.org/10.15548/alqalb.v14i1.4572
Abstract views : 77 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) : 421 times

References


Azwar, S. (2010). Metode penelitian psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Azwar, S. (2013). Sikap manusia: Teori dan pengukurannya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Bloom, B.S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objective: The Classification of educational goals. Handbook I cognitive domain. New York: Longmans, Green and Co.

Chung, B.M. (1994). The Taxonomy in the Republic of Korea. In Anderson, L.W., dan Sosiak, L.A (Eds), Bloom’s Taxonomy: A Forty - year Retrospective, Ninety - third Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (hlm. 363 – 173). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Effendi, R. (2017). Konsep revisi taksonomi bloom dan implementasinya pada pelajaran matematika SMP. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 72-78.

Flavell, J. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A New area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906 – 911.

Lewy, A., & Bathory, Z. (1994). The Taxonomy of educational objectives ind Continental Europe, the Mediterranean, and the Middle East. In Anderson, L.W., dan Sosiak, L.A (Eds), Bloom’s Taxonomy: A Forty - year Retrospective, Ninety - third Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (hlm. 146 – 163). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Paris, S., Lipson, M., & Wixson, K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reading. Contemporary Educational Psycilogy, 8, 293 – 316.

Postlethwaite, T.N. (1994). Validity vs utility: Personal experiences with the taxonomy. In Anderson, L.W., dan Sosiak, L.A (Eds), Bloom’s Taxonomy: A Forty - year Retrospective, Ninety - third Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (hlm. 174 – 180). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Purwanto. (2014). Evaluasi hasil belajar. 6th ed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Ruang Jurnal,
Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Studi Agama,
UIN Imam Bonjol Padang
Jl. Mahmud Yunus No.6,Lubuk Lintah,
Kota Padang, Sumatra Barat
E-mail: jurnal-alqalb@uinib.ac.id

 


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.