Penerapan Metode Copras dalam Pemilihan Kepala Pengendalian Mutu (Head Of Quality Control)

Joko Sunadi, Asriwan Guci, Abrar Tanjung

Abstract


In the selection of the current Head of Quality Control is appointed manually based solely on the information provided in the application and the decisions that have been raised are inaccurate and cause delays causing the assessment not to be completed. In addition, when recruiting the Head of Quality Control manually, there are several things that can cause problems, such as hiring a Head of Quality Control who does not meet the criteria set by the company, carrying out a slow selection process, and others. The methodology used is the Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS) method, which is an approach used to collect data and develop systems and applications to assist companies in making decisions based on common problems. The calculation results with COPRAS were obtained from 10 selected employees, the highest UI score of 100 and the lowest of 52.18. Companies can find qualified managers who meet organizational standards by implementing a decision support system based on this COPRAS methodology.

Full Text:

PDF


DOI: https://doi.org/10.15548/jostech.v3i2.6885
Abstract views : 109 times
PDF : 69 times

References


T. Yolanda and M. Sihite, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Kelompok Nelayan Terbaik Menerapkan Metode Copras,” vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 106–110, 2020.

M. Chiesa, A. Aditya, R. Hendayani, and D. Ph, “ANALISIS LEAN SIX SIGMA PADA KUALITAS PRODUK SEMEN DI PT SEMEN PADANG ( STUDI KASUS : PABRIK INDARUNG III ) LEAN SIX SIGMA ANALYSIS OF CEMENT PRODUCT QUALITY AT PT SEMEN PADANG ( CASE STUDY : INDARUNG III PLANT ),” vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 3341–3350, 2020.

A. R. Mishra, P. Liu, and P. Rani, “COPRAS method based on interval-valued hesitant Fermatean fuzzy sets and its application in selecting desalination technology,” Appl. Soft Comput., vol. 119, p. 108570, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2022.108570.

R. Şahin, “COPRAS Method with Neutrosophic Sets BT - Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision-Making Using Neutrosophic Sets,” C. Kahraman and İ. Otay, Eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 487–524. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-00045-5_19.

S. B. Patil, T. A. Patole, R. S. Jadhav, S. S. Suryawanshi, and S. J. Raykar, “Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS) based Multiple-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) paradigm for hard turning process parameters,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 59, pp. 835–840, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.142.

M. Akram, N. Ramzan, and F. Feng, “Extending COPRAS Method with Linguistic Fermatean Fuzzy Sets and Hamy Mean Operators,” vol. 2022, 2022.

A. Alinezhad and J. Khalili, “COPRAS Method BT - New Methods and Applications in Multiple Attribute Decision Making (MADM),” A. Alinezhad and J. Khalili, Eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 87–91. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-15009-9_12.

P. Pitchipoo, D. S. Vincent, and N. S. Rajakarunakaran, “12th GLOBAL CONGRESS ON MANUFACTURING AND MANAGEMENT , GCMM 2014 COPRAS Decision Model to Optimize Blind Spot in Heavy Vehicles : A Comparative Perspective,” Procedia Eng., vol. 97, pp. 1049–1059, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.383.

M. Dachyar, “Selection Factor Analysis for Internet of Things ( IoT ) Implementation using DEMATEL based ANP and COPRAS Method at the Hospital Intensive Care Unit Selection Factor Analysis for Internet of Things ( IoT ) Implementation using DEMATEL based ANP and COPRA,” no. June, 2020.

T. Nuuter, I. Lill, and L. Tupenaite, “Land Use Policy Comparison of housing market sustainability in European countries based on multiple criteria assessment,” Land use policy, vol. 42, pp. 642–651, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.09.022.

H. Gitinavard and M. A. Shirazi, “An extended intuitionistic fuzzy modified group complex proportional assessment approach,” J. Ind. Syst. Eng., vol. 11, pp. 229–246, 2018.

Y. Kustiyahningsih, “Integration of FAHP and COPRAS Method for New Student Admission Decision Making,” 2020.

S. Narayanamoorthy, L. Ramya, S. Kalaiselvan, J. Varghese, and D. Kang, “Socio-Economic Planning Sciences Use of DEMATEL and COPRAS method to select best alternative fuel for control of impact of greenhouse gas emissions,” Socioecon. Plann. Sci., no. June, p. 100996, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2020.100996.

A. P. Darko, “An extended COPRAS method for multiattribute group decision making based on dual hesitant fuzzy Maclaurin symmetric mean”, doi: 10.1002/int.22234.

H. Song and Z. Chen, “Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Method Based Distance and COPRAS Method with Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Environment,” vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1229–1241, 2021.

A. Raj, M. Pratibha, R. Kamal, and R. Pardasani, “Multiple-criteria decision-making for service quality selection based on Shapley COPRAS method under hesitant fuzzy sets,” Granul. Comput., vol. 0, no. 0, p. 0, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s41066-018-0103-8.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 JOSTECH Journal of Science and Technology

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.