Post-Modernism and the Emergence of Alternate History

Atqo Akmal

Abstract


The emergence of post-modernism in the mid-20th century marked a seismic shift in historical knowledge, challenging long-held assumptions about the relationship between language, truth, and reality. This paper explores the profound impact of post-modernism on the discipline of history, focusing on its influence on the concept of alternate history. Post-modernist thought contends that language constructs our understanding of the world rather than merely representing reality, leading to the recognition that there is no single, objective truth in history. The paper delves into the critiques and alternative frameworks notable historians propose within this post-modernist framework. It begins by examining Alun Munslow's concept of "deconstructing history," which encourages historians to critically analyze historical narratives and acknowledge the subjectivity inherent in interpretation. Keith Jenkins's "own-sakism" is introduced as a response to the post-modernist critique of historical objectivity, advocating for acknowledging and embracing historians' subjectivity. The paper also explores Hayden White's "metahistory," which critiques the narrative structure of history and invites historians to be more self-conscious about narrative choices. It concludes by highlighting the enduring legacy of post-modernism in history, emphasizing the importance of reflexivity, transparency, and critical self-examination in the pursuit of historical knowledge. The paper contends that post-modernism has not only challenged historical objectivity but has also opened up new possibilities for a more inclusive and diverse historiography.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ayers, J. (2002). In the Balance: An Alternative History of the Second World War. In Library Journal (Vol. 127, Issue 5, p. 136). MSI Information Services. https://www.proquest.com/docview/196903887/abstract/B04D2F46C40743D1PQ/1

Baier, C. (2023). Narratives of Post-Truth: Lyotard and the Epistemic Fragmentation of Society. Theory, Culture & Society, 02632764231162027. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764231162027

Bain, R. B. (2006). Rounding up unusual suspects: Facing the authority hidden in the history classroom. Teachers College Record. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00775.x

Boldt, A. (2014). Ranke: Objectivity and history. Rethinking History, 18(4), 457–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2014.893658

Booth, C., Rowlinson, M., Clark, P., Delahaye, A., & Procter, S. (2009). Scenarios and counterfactuals as modal narratives. Futures, 41(2), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2008.07.037

Browning, G. K. (2000). Lyotard and the End of Grand Narratives. University of Wales Press.

Currie, M. (2010). Postmodern Narrative Theory. Bloomsbury Publishing.

De Saussure, F. (1916). Nature of the linguistic sign. Course in General Linguistics, 1, 65–70.

Derrida, J. (1993). Force of Law: The “Mystical Foundation of Authority.” In Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice. Routledge.

Derrida, J. (2016). Of Grammatology. JHU Press.

Foucault, M. (1982). The Subject and Power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795. https://doi.org/10.1086/448181

Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

Greene, M. (1994). Postmodernism and the Crisis of Representation. English Education, 26(4), 206–219.

Grenz, S. J. (1996). A Primer on Postmodernism. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing.

Hassan, I. (1985). The Culture of Postmodernism. Theory, Culture & Society, 2(3), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276485002003010

Hellekson, K. (2000). Toward a taxonomy of the alternate history genre. Extrapolation (Pre-2012), 41(3), 248–256.

Hidayat, M. A. (2019). MENIMBANG TEORI-TEORI SOSIAL POSTMODERN: SEJARAH, PEMIKIRAN, KRITIK DAN MASA DEPAN POSTMODERNISME. Journal of Urban Sociology, 2(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.30742/jus.v2i1.610

Hutcheon, L. (2003a). A Poetics of Postmodernism: History, Theory, Fiction. Routledge.

Hutcheon, L. (2003b). The Politics of Postmodernism. Routledge.

Iggers, G. G. (2005). Historiography in the Twentieth Century: From Scientific Objectivity to the Postmodern Challenge. Wesleyan University Press.

Jenkins, K. (1997). The Postmodern History Reader. Psychology Press.

Jenkins, K. (2003). Rethinking History. Routledge.

Jenkins, K. (2009). Why bother with history? In At the Limits of History. Routledge.

Jenkins, K., & Munslow, A. (2004). The Nature of History Reader. Psychology Press.

Kansteiner, W. (1993). Hayden White’s Critique of the Writing of History. History and Theory, 32(3), 273–295. https://doi.org/10.2307/2505526

Knopf, J. W. (2006). Doing a Literature Review. PS: Political Science & Politics, 39(1), 127–132. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096506060264

Lemon, M. C. (n.d.). Philosophy of History: A Guide for Students.

Lemon, M. C. (2003). Philosophy of history: A guide for students. Routledge.

Liñán, M. V. (2010). History as a propaganda tool in Putin’s Russia. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 43(2), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2010.03.001

Lyotard, J.-F. (1993). The Postmodern Explained: Correspondence, 1982-1985. U of Minnesota Press.

Lyotard, J.-F., & Brügger, N. (2001). What about the Postmodern? The Concept of the Postmodern in the Work of Lyotard. Yale French Studies, 99, 77–92. https://doi.org/10.2307/2903244

Matthews, J. C. (2021). Dominant Narratives and Historical Perspective in Time Travel Stories: A Case Study of Doctor Who. The Social Studies, 112(2), 76–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2020.1829527

Munslow, A. (2006). Deconstructing History. Taylor & Francis.

Munslow, A. (2018). Narrative and History. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Newman, S. (2001). Derrida’s deconstruction of authority. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 27(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/019145370102700301

Paans, O. (2020). Postmodernity and the Politics of Fragmentation.

Purwanto, B. (2012). Historisme Baru dan Kesadaran Dekonstruktif: Kajian Kritis terhadap Historiografi Indonesiasentris. Humaniora, 13(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.709

Rigby, S. H. (1995). Historical Causation: Is One Thing more Important than Another? History, 80(259), 227–242.

Rosenfeld, G. (2002). Why Do We Ask “What If?” Reflections on the Function of Alternate History. History and Theory, 41(4), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2303.00222

Rosenfeld, G. D. (2005). The World Hitler Never Made: Alternate History and the Memory of Nazism. Cambridge University Press.

Ryan, M.-L., Ruppert, J., & Bernet, J. W. (2004). Narrative across media: The languages of storytelling. U of Nebraska Press.

Schneider-Mayerson, M. (2009). What Almost Was: The Politics of the Contemporary Alternate History Novel. American Studies, 50(3/4), 63–83.

Seidman, S. (1994). The Postmodern Turn: New Perspectives on Social Theory. Cambridge University Press.

Singles, K. (2013). Alternate History: Playing with Contingency and Necessity. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110272475

Soetomo, G. (n.d.). RADIKALISME DI INDONESIA SEJARAH REKONTRUKSI DAN DEKONSTRUKSI.

Sterelny, K. (2016). Contingency and History. Philosophy of Science, 83(4), 521–539. https://doi.org/10.1086/687260

White, H. (1980). The Value of Narrativity in the Representation of Reality. Critical Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1086/448086

White, H. (2014). Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe. JHU Press.

Wolfreys, J. (1998). Deconstruction—Derrida. Bloomsbury Publishing.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15548/thje.v6i1.9101

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Atqo Akmal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang
email: tarikhuna@uinib.ac.id

View My Stats

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.