Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Pengembangan Profesional Dosen

Hidayati - Hidayati, Rivdya Eliza, Jum Anidar

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis hubungan antara motivasi kerja dan pengembangan profesional dosen dalam bidang penelitian. Motivasi kerja dosen dianalisis berdasarkan tiga kategori utama: Need for Achievement (Kebutuhan untuk Berprestasi), Need for Power (Kebutuhan untuk Berkuasa), dan Need for Affiliation (Kebutuhan untuk Berafiliasi). Pengembangan profesional dosen diukur melalui partisipasi dalam pelatihan profesional, pendidikan profesional, dan pendukung profesional. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa motivasi kerja dosen dalam penelitian terutama didorong oleh kebutuhan berafiliasi, dengan skor tertinggi pada indikator ingin diterima oleh lingkungan akademik. Di sisi lain, dorongan untuk berprestasi dan mencapai sukses juga tinggi, menunjukkan bahwa dosen termotivasi oleh pengakuan dan prestasi dalam penelitian mereka. Dalam pengembangan profesional, dosen lebih banyak terlibat dalam kursus singkat dan workshop yang praktis dibandingkan dengan kegiatan yang berfokus pada teori atau jangka panjang. Analisis menunjukkan adanya hubungan positif yang signifikan antara motivasi kerja dosen dan pengembangan profesional, di mana motivasi afiliasi dan prestasi memainkan peran penting dalam mendorong partisipasi dosen dalam berbagai kegiatan pengembangan profesional. Kesimpulannya, untuk meningkatkan motivasi dan produktivitas dosen dalam penelitian, institusi perlu menyediakan lebih banyak peluang untuk pelatihan praktis, pengakuan akademik, dan kolaborasi.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alperin, J. P., Bliss, C. A., & Harnard, S. (2020). The role of institutional support in faculty research development. Research Evaluation, 29(4), 405–415. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvz014

Benedicta, Awusi, & Atiku. (2023). Analytical Overview of Some Motivational Theories and Their Implications in Provision of Continuous Professional Development of Staff of Colleges of Education and Analogous Institutions. British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies, 4. https://doi.org/doi: 10.37745/bjmas.2022.0226

Borko, H., Zaccarelli, F. G., Reigh, E., & Osborne, J. (2021). Teacher facilitation of elementary science discourse after a professional development initiative. The Elementary School Journal, 121(4), 561–585.

Coleman, M., & Early, P. (2005). Leadership and Management in Education (Cultures Change and Context). New York: Oxford University Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2015). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2020). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer.

Djunaedi, D., Dwi, Erlin, Effendi, S., Arianto, H., & Iriawan. (2023). Effectiveness of Lecturer Development Programs in the Context of Higher Education Management. https://doi.org/doi: 10.31958/jaf.v11i2.12077

Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Gagne, M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement. Motivation and Emotion, 44(1), 1-11. Motivation and Emotion, 44(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-019-09832-x

Godek, A. (2020). The impact of cross-disciplinary collaborations on faculty research productivity. , 45(6), 1168-1180. C. Studies in Higher Education, 45(6), 1168–1180. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1541460

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2017). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Pearson.

He, Y., Wu, L., & Hu, J. (2021). Research-based learning: A systematic review of the research literature. 46(4), 751–769. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1705801

Knight, P. T., & Tait, J. (2018). The role of research training in faculty development. Higher Education, 75(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0141-5

Lee, Y. S., & Bozeman, B. (2018). Training and skills development in higher education: A study of faculty development programs. Journal of Higher Education, 89(2), 292–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2017.1373756

Leithwood, K., Sun, J., & Schumacker, R. (2021). How school leadership influences student learning: A test of “high power” and “low power” leadership styles. Educational Administration Quarterly, 57(3), 341–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X211011254

Maslow, A. H. (2019). Motivation and personality (3rd ed.). Harper & Row.

McClelland, D. C. (2018). Human motivation. Cambridge University Press.

McKenzie, R., & Bode, L. (2021). Supporting faculty research: The role of institutional resources and collaboration. Innovative Higher Education, 46(2), 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-020-09519-x

Mezirow, J. (2018). Transformative learning theory. In Contemporary theories of learning. Routledge.

Petrescu, M., Mc Donald, L., & Badescu, S. (2020). Challenges of balancing teaching and research: Insights from academic faculty. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(5), 909–922. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-05-2020-0223

Robbins, S. P. (2003). Organizational Behavior. (Tim Indeks, Alih Bahasa). PT Indeks Kelompok Gramedia.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.

Schaefer, M., De Jong, E., & Henneman, A. (2019). The importance of collaborative research for faculty development. Educational Research Review, 24, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100246

Slovin, L. (1960). Slovin’s formula for sample size determination. Sociological Methodology, 1, 1-6. Social Methodology, 1, 1–6.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15548/atj.v10i2.10004

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Hidayati - Hidayati, Rivdya - Eliza, Jum - Anidar

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.