Analisis Kesalahan Terjemahan Arab–Indonesia: Kajian Pustaka

Abstract

This study aims to holistically review the types, factors, and solutions regarding Arabic-Indonesian translation errors, specifically within morphological, syntactic, and semantic aspects. Employing a qualitative approach with a literature review method, this research synthesizes various academic sources and empirical findings related to translation problems in both manual and machine-assisted processes. The analysis reveals that semantic errors predominate at 40%, followed by syntactic errors (30%) and morphological errors (25%). The dominance of semantic errors stems from a failure to capture balaghah (rhetorical) nuances and polysemy, while syntactic errors are triggered by the structural disparity between Arabic’s Verb-Subject-Object (VSO) patterns and Indonesian’s Subject-Predicate-Object (SPO) framework. Internal factors, such as insufficient mastery of nahwu-sharaf (grammar and morphology) and cultural interference, are identified as primary causes of low translation quality among students and digital engines. As a solution, this study recommends intensifying curricula based on error analysis, integrating balaghah comprehension into the adaptation process, and utilizing a hybrid approach that combines technology with manual post-editing to maintain the accuracy of Islamic texts and the credibility of academic publications.