AN ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH ITEM TEST ON FINAL EXAMINATION FOR NINTH GRADE AT MTSN 2 PADANG PARIAMAN

Nurul Sutria Ismail, Martin Kustati, Darmayenti Darmayenti

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to analyze the types and levels of English items tested on the final examination. This was a descriptive research method with content analysis. The data sources analyzed were based on English tests for the last 3 years (2019, 2020, and 2021 academic years) of 9th grade at MTSN 2 Padang Pariaman. The result of the data analysis revealed that most of the item tests were multiple-choice types. The cognitive applying rate was (44%), the cognitive understanding rate was (41%), and the cognitive remembering rate was (15%). It has been determined that the English tests are middle- and low-level. It implies that English teachers should design the test by balancing the cognitive levels, including the higher, middle, and low levels.

Keywords


Analysis, English Item Test and Final Examination

Full Text:

PDF


DOI: https://doi.org/10.15548/rielt.v9i1.7714
Abstract views : 32 times
PDF : 21 times

References


Arikunto, Suharsimi. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2009.

Barst, R., and M. McGoon. “Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta Badesch, D., Barst, R., Delcroix, M., McLaughlin., Olschewski, H., Sitbon, O V.

and Vizza, C. 2004. Prostanoid Therapy for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Journal of the American College of Cardiology; 43

(12): 56.” Cardiology 41, no. 12 (2003): 2119–25.

Browder, Diane M., Shawnee Wakeman, and Claudia P. Flowers. “Assessment of Progress in the General Curriculum for Students with Disabilities.” Theory into Practice 45, no. 3 (2006): 249–59.

Brown, E. Ray, Prithvi S. Kandhal, and Jingna Zhang. “Performance Testing for Hot Mix Asphalt.” NCAT Report 1, no. 05 (2001).

Brown, H. Douglas, and Priyanvada Abeywickrama. “Language Assessment.” Principles and Classroom Practices. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education, 2004.

Brown, W. J., S. G. Trost, A. Bauman, Kerry Mummery, and Neville Owen. “Test-Retest Reliability of Four Physical Activity Measures Used in Population Surveys.” Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 7, no. 2 (2004): 205–15.

INDRIASARI, Eria Latifa. “Analisis Soal Ujian Nasional Bahasa Indonesia Tingkat SMA Tahun Pelajaran 2016/2017 Berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom Versi Revisi,” n.d.

Moleong, Lexy J. “Moleong.” Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, 2019.

Rohmawati, Naili, Fetro Muhammad, and Wagiran Wagiran. “Study of Literature Appreciation Skills Assessment Instruments on Objective Types of Prose and Drama.” AKSIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia 5, no. 1 (2021): 23–

Sutrisno, Fery Hadi, Supriyono Koes-H, and Edi Supriana. “Eksplorasi LOTS Dan HOTS Materi Optik Geometri Siswa Kelas 12 SMAN 9 Malang.” Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 2018, 21–28.

Widana, I. Wayan. “Modul Penyusunan Soal Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS).” Direktorat Pembinaan SMA Kemdikbud, 2017.

Wilson, Leslie Owen. “Anderson and Krathwohl–Bloom’s Taxonomy Revised.”

Understanding the New Version of Bloom’s Taxonomy, 2016.

Yuniar, Maharani, Cece Rakhmat Rakhmat, and Asep Saepulrohman. “Analisis HOTS (High Order Thinking Skills) Pada Soal Objektif Tes Dalam Mata Pelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial (Ips) Kelas V SD Negeri 7 Ciamis.” PEDADIDAKTIKA: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar 2, no. 2 (2015): 187–95.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Ruang Jurnal Program Studi Tadris Bahasa Inggri
Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan
Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bojol Padang
email: rieltjournal@uinib.ac.id

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.