The Effectiveness of Flowcharts in Improving Students' Analytical Exposition Writing Ability
Abstract
This study investigated the effectiveness of using flowcharts in improving students' analytical exposition writing ability. Writing analytical exposition texts presents significant challenges for students, particularly in organizing arguments and developing coherent ideas. While various instructional strategies have been explored, the potential of flowcharts as a visual organizing tool for writing instruction remains largely unexplored. This pre-experimental study employed a one-group pre-test post-test design, involving 31 twelfth-grade students in the first semester of the 2023/2024 academic year. The intervention consisted of three treatment sessions where flowcharts were systematically implemented to guide students through the writing process. Data were collected through writing tests administered before and after the treatment. The results revealed a significant improvement in students' writing performance, with mean scores increasing from 66.93 in the pre-test to 76.41 in the post-test (p < 0.05). Qualitative observations indicated progressive improvement in student engagement and confidence across the treatment sessions, transitioning from initial hesitation to active participation and enhanced idea generation by the final session. The findings suggest that flowchart-based instruction can effectively improve students' analytical exposition writing ability, particularly when integrated with contextually relevant topics. This study contributes to the growing body of research on structured writing interventions and offers practical implications for writing instruction methodology.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C. K., & Walker, D. A. (2019). Introduction to research in education (Tenth edition. Student edition). Cengage.
Emilia, E., Habibi, N., & Bangga, L. A. (2018). AN ANALYSIS OF COHESION OF EXPOSITION TEXTS: AN INDONESIAN CONTEXT. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(3), 515. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i3.9791
Graham, S., Collins, A. A., & Rigby-Wills, H. (2017). Writing Characteristics of Students With Learning Disabilities and Typically Achieving Peers: A Meta-Analysis. Exceptional Children, 83(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402916664070
Hyytinen, H., Löfström, E., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2017). Challenges in Argumentation and Paraphrasing Among Beginning Students in Educational Sciences. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(4), 411–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1147072
Khonamari, F., Hashemi, E., Pavlikova, M., & Petrasova, B. (2021). Coherence Problems of EFL Students’ Writing in Light of the Gricean Maxims. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 12(2), 294–313. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2021.2.294.313
Lee, Y., & Paz, S. D. L. (2021). Science Writing Intervention Research for Students With and At Risk for Learning Disabilities, and English Learners: A Systematic Review. Learning Disability Quarterly, 44(4), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/07319487211018213
Little, C. W., Clark, J. C., Tani, N. E., & Connor, C. M. (2018). Improving writing skills through technology‐based instruction: A meta‐analysis. Review of Education, 6(2), 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3114
Miller, R. T., & Pessoa, S. (2016). Where’s Your Thesis Statement and What Happened to Your Topic Sentences? Identifying Organizational Challenges in Undergraduate Student Argumentative Writing. TESOL Journal, 7(4), 847–873. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.248
Ritchey, K. D., Coker, D. L., Myers, M. C., & Zhang, F. (2023). Teaching Students to Write Sentences: A Review of the Literature. Topics in Language Disorders, 43(4), 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0000000000000323
Rodliyah, R. S., & Liani, A. E. (2022). SFL analysis: An investigation of students’ use of cohesive devices in exposition text. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v12i1.46596
Setyowati, L., Mujaddidah, A., Sukmawan, S., & El-Sulukiyyah, A. A. (2020). COMPARING THE HIGH AND LOW ACHIEVER STUDENTS’ DIFFICULTIES IN LEARNING WRITING DURING REMOTE LEARNING. Academic Journal Perspective : Education, Language, and Literature, 8(2), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.33603/perspective.v8i2.4074
Shilo, G., & Ragonis, N. (2023). Students’ abilities to formulate exhaustive titles as a key to comprehending arguments. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33(2), 132–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12454
Yuliana, D., & Gandana, I. S. S. (2018). WRITERS’ VOICE AND ENGAGEMENT STRATEGIES IN STUDENTS’ ANALYTICAL EXPOSITION TEXTS. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(3), 613. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i3.9812
Zhang, J.-H., Meng, B., Zou, L.-C., Zhu, Y., & Hwang, G.-J. (2023). Progressive flowchart development scaffolding to improve university students’ computational thinking and programming self-efficacy. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(6), 3792–3809. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1943687
Zimmermann, A. E., King, E. E., & Bose, D. D. (2024). Effectiveness and Utility of Flowcharts on Learning in a Classroom Setting: A Mixed-Methods Study. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 88(1), 100591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2023.100591
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15548/rielt.v0i0.10682
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Ruang Jurnal Program Studi Tadris Bahasa Inggri
Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan
Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bojol Padang
email: rieltjournal@uinib.ac.id

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.