The Effectiveness of Flowcharts in Improving Students' Analytical Exposition Writing Ability

Satria Adi Pradana, Mira Anggraini, Galang Tirta Yudha

Abstract


This study investigated the effectiveness of using flowcharts in improving students' analytical exposition writing ability. Writing analytical exposition texts presents significant challenges for students, particularly in organizing arguments and developing coherent ideas. While various instructional strategies have been explored, the potential of flowcharts as a visual organizing tool for writing instruction remains largely unexplored. This pre-experimental study employed a one-group pre-test post-test design, involving 31 twelfth-grade students in the first semester of the 2023/2024 academic year. The intervention consisted of three treatment sessions where flowcharts were systematically implemented to guide students through the writing process. Data were collected through writing tests administered before and after the treatment. The results revealed a significant improvement in students' writing performance, with mean scores increasing from 66.93 in the pre-test to 76.41 in the post-test (p < 0.05). Qualitative observations indicated progressive improvement in student engagement and confidence across the treatment sessions, transitioning from initial hesitation to active participation and enhanced idea generation by the final session. The findings suggest that flowchart-based instruction can effectively improve students' analytical exposition writing ability, particularly when integrated with contextually relevant topics. This study contributes to the growing body of research on structured writing interventions and offers practical implications for writing instruction methodology.


Keywords


Flowcharts, analytical exposition text; writing ability; visual organizing tool; writing instruction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C. K., & Walker, D. A. (2019). Introduction to research in education (Tenth edition. Student edition). Cengage.

Emilia, E., Habibi, N., & Bangga, L. A. (2018). AN ANALYSIS OF COHESION OF EXPOSITION TEXTS: AN INDONESIAN CONTEXT. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(3), 515. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i3.9791

Graham, S., Collins, A. A., & Rigby-Wills, H. (2017). Writing Characteristics of Students With Learning Disabilities and Typically Achieving Peers: A Meta-Analysis. Exceptional Children, 83(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402916664070

Hyytinen, H., Löfström, E., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2017). Challenges in Argumentation and Paraphrasing Among Beginning Students in Educational Sciences. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(4), 411–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1147072

Khonamari, F., Hashemi, E., Pavlikova, M., & Petrasova, B. (2021). Coherence Problems of EFL Students’ Writing in Light of the Gricean Maxims. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 12(2), 294–313. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2021.2.294.313

Lee, Y., & Paz, S. D. L. (2021). Science Writing Intervention Research for Students With and At Risk for Learning Disabilities, and English Learners: A Systematic Review. Learning Disability Quarterly, 44(4), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/07319487211018213

Little, C. W., Clark, J. C., Tani, N. E., & Connor, C. M. (2018). Improving writing skills through technology‐based instruction: A meta‐analysis. Review of Education, 6(2), 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3114

Miller, R. T., & Pessoa, S. (2016). Where’s Your Thesis Statement and What Happened to Your Topic Sentences? Identifying Organizational Challenges in Undergraduate Student Argumentative Writing. TESOL Journal, 7(4), 847–873. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.248

Ritchey, K. D., Coker, D. L., Myers, M. C., & Zhang, F. (2023). Teaching Students to Write Sentences: A Review of the Literature. Topics in Language Disorders, 43(4), 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0000000000000323

Rodliyah, R. S., & Liani, A. E. (2022). SFL analysis: An investigation of students’ use of cohesive devices in exposition text. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v12i1.46596

Setyowati, L., Mujaddidah, A., Sukmawan, S., & El-Sulukiyyah, A. A. (2020). COMPARING THE HIGH AND LOW ACHIEVER STUDENTS’ DIFFICULTIES IN LEARNING WRITING DURING REMOTE LEARNING. Academic Journal Perspective : Education, Language, and Literature, 8(2), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.33603/perspective.v8i2.4074

Shilo, G., & Ragonis, N. (2023). Students’ abilities to formulate exhaustive titles as a key to comprehending arguments. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33(2), 132–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12454

Yuliana, D., & Gandana, I. S. S. (2018). WRITERS’ VOICE AND ENGAGEMENT STRATEGIES IN STUDENTS’ ANALYTICAL EXPOSITION TEXTS. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(3), 613. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i3.9812

Zhang, J.-H., Meng, B., Zou, L.-C., Zhu, Y., & Hwang, G.-J. (2023). Progressive flowchart development scaffolding to improve university students’ computational thinking and programming self-efficacy. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(6), 3792–3809. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1943687

Zimmermann, A. E., King, E. E., & Bose, D. D. (2024). Effectiveness and Utility of Flowcharts on Learning in a Classroom Setting: A Mixed-Methods Study. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 88(1), 100591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2023.100591




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15548/rielt.v0i0.10682

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Ruang Jurnal Program Studi Tadris Bahasa Inggri
Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan
Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bojol Padang
email: rieltjournal@uinib.ac.id

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.