EXPLORING THE INTERPRETATION OF PLANE GEOMETRY FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE PHILOSOPHY OF MATHEMATICS EDUCATION: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL STUDY BASED ON SOCIO-SCIENCE

Putri Yulia, Lisa Dwi Afri, Rukiyati Rukiyati

Abstract


This study explores how first-semester mathematics education students experienced plane geometry learning when geometric concepts were connected to spatial-use issues at Pasar Raya Padang. A qualitative study was conducted using a descriptive phenomenological orientation. The participants were nine students (P1–P9), who worked in three groups and completed a contextual worksheet on points and lines, parallel lines, distance, and the division of a plane. Data consisted of students’ worksheet responses and phenomenological interview accounts. The data were examined through repeated reading, identification of meaning units, comparison across data sources, development of meaning patterns, and formulation of themes. The findings are organized into three related themes: spatial field awareness, spatial dynamics, and reconstructive action. Students connected the position of points and boundary lines with safety and access; interpreted the constant distance between parallel lines in relation to sidewalk width and pedestrian movement; and questioned whether equal spatial division necessarily represented fair allocation. Some participants also related contextual geometry to their prospective role as mathematics teachers, while P6 maintained a stronger emphasis on geometry as formal knowledge. The study indicates that contextual plane geometry tasks can create opportunities for students to use mathematical representations to examine social consequences, although the findings are limited to the participants and learning episode studied. In this article, Mathematica Socio-Science is treated as an author-developed analytical lens rather than an established, universally recognized theory.

Keywords


Geometry; Mathematica Socio-Science; Phenomenology; Philosophy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alase, A. (2017). The Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA): A Guide to a Good Qualitative Research Approach. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 5(2), 9. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.5n.2p.9

Alhazmi, A. A., & Kaufmann, A. (2022). Phenomenological Qualitative Methods Applied to the Analysis of Cross-Cultural Experience in Novel Educational Social Contexts. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 785134. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.785134

Batiibwe, K., & Sara, M. (2024). The Role of Ethnomathematics in Mathematics Education: A Literature Review. Asian Journal for Mathematics Education, 3(4), 383–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/27527263241300400

Boadu, S. K., & Bonyah, E. (2024). The Role of Philosophy of Mathematics Education in Mathematics Teacher Education. Cogent Education, 11(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2433832

Coles, A., Solares-Rojas, A., & le Roux, K. (2024). Socio-Ecological Gestures of Mathematics Education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 116(2), 165–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-024-10318-4

Drimalla, J. (2025). Inferences, Mastery, and Objectivity: Examining Student Understanding of Mathematical Concepts with Inferentialism. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 119(2), 393–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-024-10377-7

Ernest, P. (2016). The Philosophy of Mathematics Education. In The Philosophy of Mathematics Education. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203058923

Ernest, P. (2021). Mathematics, Ethics and Purism: An Application of MacIntyre’s Virtue Theory. Synthese, 199(1–2), 3137–3167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02928-1

Harper, F. K., & Kudaisi, Q. J. (2023). Geometry, Groceries, and Gardens: Learning Mathematics and Social Justice through a Nested, Equity-Directed Instructional Approach. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 71, 101069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2023.101069

Hong, D. S., & Runnalls, C. (2021). Is it the Width, the Height, or the Length?: Pre-Service Teachers’ Responses to a Volume Task. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 52(3), 477–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1772389

Jablonski, S., & Ludwig, M. (2023). Teaching and Learning of Geometry—A Literature Review on Current Developments in Theory and Practice. Education Sciences, 13(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070682

Karahan, E. (2022). The Lived Experiences of Pre-Service Science Teachers Designing and Teaching Socioscientific Issues-Based Units. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 4(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-022-00064-z

Linda, F. (2021). Thematic Analysis: The ‘Good’, the ‘Bad’ and the ‘Ugly.’ European Journal for Qualitative Research in Psychotherapy, 11, 103–116. https://doi.org/10.24377/EJQRP.article3062

Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power. Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444

Neubauer, B. E., Witkop, C. T., & Varpio, L. (2019). How Phenomenology Can Help Us Learn from the Experiences of Others. Perspectives on Medical Education, 8(2), 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-0509-2

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Padang, U. I. B. (2026). FST Gelar Lokakarya Kurikulum Integratif dan Perangkatnya.

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

Patahuddin, S. M., Ramful, A., Lowrie, T., & Bholoa, A. (2022). Subtleties in Spatial Visualization Maneuvers: Insights from Numerical Solutions. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 67, 100988. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2022.100988

Rawat, V. K., & Nagaraju, M. T. V. (2026). A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Trends in Ethnomathematics Using the Scopus Database. Discov Educ, 5(1), 332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-026-01307-1

Rosa, M., Orey, D. C., Shirley, L., Palhares, P., Rosa, M., Orey, D. C., & Rosa, M. (2016). State of the Art in Ethnomathematics. In In Current and future perspectives of ethnomathematics as a program. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938839

Rosa, M., Shirley, L., Gavarrete, M. E., & Alangui, W. V. (2017). Ethnomathematics and its Diverse Approaches for Mathematics Education. Springer International Publishing.

Rytilä, J. (2021). Social Constructivism in Mathematics? The Promise and Shortcomings of Julian Cole’s Institutional Account. Synthese, 199(3–4), 11517–11540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03300-7

Skovsmose, O. (2012). An Invitation to Critical Mathematics Education. Springer Science & Business Media. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=AmH-XSiQ7qkC&printsec=frontcover&hl=id#v=onepage&q&f=false

Skovsmose, O. (2020). Critical Mathematics Education. In In Encyclopedia of mathematics education. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_34

Sundler, A. J., Lindberg, E., Nilsson, C., & Palmér, L. (2019). Qualitative Thematic Analysis Based on Descriptive Phenomenology. Nursing Open, 6(3), 733–739. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.275

Suparman, Marasabessy, R., & Helsa, Y. (2024). Fostering Spatial Visualization in GeoGebra-Assisted Geometry Lesson: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(9), em2509. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15170

Tambunan, L. (2025). The Relationship Between the Philosophy of Mathematics and Culture-Based Learning Models. EduMatSains : Jurnal Pendidikan, Matematika Dan Sains, 9(2), 90–101. https://doi.org/10.33541/edumatsains.v9i2.6429

Thomas, C. A., Berry, R. Q., & Sebastian, R. (2024). Examining the Elements of Culturally Relevant Pedagogy Captured and Missed in a Measure of High-Quality Mathematics Instruction. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 56(5), 953–964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01595-7

Weigand, H. G., Hollebrands, K., & Maschietto, M. (2025). Geometry Education at Secondary Level – A Systematic Literature Review. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 57(4), 829–843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-025-01703-1

Yang, X., Kaiser, G., König, J., & Blömeke, S. (2020). Relationship between Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Knowledge, Beliefs and Instructional Practices in China. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 52(2), 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01145-x

Yulia, P., & Nasution, E. Y. P. (2024). Geometry and Islamic Values: Validity of Teaching Materials Based on Modified Project-Based Learning Model. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 13(1), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v13i1.1980




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15548/mej.v10i2.15042

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Author

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Sinta 2
Accredited Sinta 2 Starting from Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024) until Vol. 13 No. 1 (2029)
Math Educa Journal
Mathematics Education Department | FTK UIN Imam Bonjol Padang

Jl. Prof. Mahmud Yunus Lubuk Lintah, Anduring, Kec. Kuranji, Kota Padang, Sumatera Barat 25153

Email: [email protected]
p-ISSN: 2580-6726 | e-ISSN: 2598-2133