THE EFFECTS AND INTERACTION OF GENDER AND LEARNING STYLES ON TENTH-GRADE STUDENTS' MATHEMATICAL REPRESENTATION ABILITY
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Blanca, M. J., Alarcón, R., Arnau, J., Bono, R., & Bendayan, R. (2017). Non-Normal Data: Is ANOVA Still A Valid Option? Psicothema, 29(4), 552–557. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.383
Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004). Learning Styles and Pedagogy in Post-16 Lea`rning: A Systematic and Critical Review. Learning and Skills Research Centre.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2end ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Duval, R. (2006). A Cognitive Analysis of Problems of Comprehension in a Learning of Mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1–2), 103–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-0400-z
Dwijayanti, N. K. A., Payadnya, I. P. A. A., & Wulandari, I. G. A. P. A. (2024). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Siswa dalam Mempelajari Materi Aljabar Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar Tingkat SMA Kelas XI. Jurnal Pembelajaran Dan Pengembangan Matematika (PEMANTIK), 4(2), 74–82. https://doi.org/10.36733/pemantik.v4i2.9855
Fuad, M. N. (2016). Representasi Matematis Siswa SMA dalam Memecahkan Masalah Persamaan Kuadrat Ditinjau dari Perbedaan Gender. Kreano: Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 7(2), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v7i2.5854
Hyde, J. S., Lindberg, S. M., Linn, M. C., Ellis, A. B., & Williams, C. C. (2008). Gender Similarities Characterize Math Performance. Science, 321(5888), 494–495. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1160364
Inayah, S., & Nurhasanah, G. A. (2019). Pengaruh Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa terhadap Kepercayaan Dirinya. JPPM: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 12(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppm.v12i1.4852
Kirschner, P. A. (2017). Stop Propagating the Learning Styles Myth. Computers & Education, 106, 166–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.006
Kurniati, F., Mariyam, & Buyung. (2024). Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa Ditinjau dari Perbedaan Gender. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 9(3), 373–383. https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v9i3.17520
Langsrud, Ø. (2003). ANOVA for Unbalanced Data: Use Type II Instead of Type III Sums of Squares. Statistics and Computing, 13(2), 163–167. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023260610025
Lestari, D. P., & Palupi, E. L. W. (2023). Representasi Matematis Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Teorema Pythagoras Berdasarkan Tahapan Polya Ditinjau dari Perbedaan Gender. MATHEdunesa, 12(2), 588–610. https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v12n2.p588-610
Lindberg, S. M., Hyde, J. S., Petersen, J. L., & Linn, M. C. (2010). New Trends in Gender and Mathematics Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1123–1135. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021276
Melzner, L., & Kappes, C. (2025). Testing the Meshing Hypothesis in Prospective Teachers: Are there Affects of Matching Learning Style and Presentation Mode on Learning Performance and on Metacognitive Aspects of Learning? Instructional Science, 53, 365–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-024-09689-1
Nangim, N., & Hidayati, K. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa Saat Pembelajaran dalam Jaringan di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 1034. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i2.3593
Natonis, S. F. M., Daniel, F., & Gella, N. J. M. (2022). Analisis Representasi Matematis Siswa Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(2), 3025–3033. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i2.2592
NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. United States of America: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.
Newton, P. M., & Salvi, A. (2020). How Common is Belief in the Learning Styles Neuromyth, and Does it Matter? A Pragmatic Systematic Review. Frontiers in Education, 5, Article 602451. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.602451
Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning Styles: Concepts and Evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038.x
Putra, R. W. Y., Sunyono, S., Haenilah, E. Y., Hariri, H., Sutiarso, S., Nurhanurawati, N., & Supriadi, N. (2023). Systematic Literature Review on the Recent Three-Year Trend Mathematical Representation Ability in Scopus Database. Infinity Journal, 12(2), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v12i2.p243-260
Rogowsky, B. A., Calhoun, B. M., & Tallal, P. (2020). Providing Instruction Based on Students’ Learning Style Preferences Does Not Improve Learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 164. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00164
Sintia, & Effendi, K. N. S. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa SMAN 1 Klari. Transformasi: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Matematika, 6(2), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.36526/tr.v6i2.2225
Sugihartini, R., Amrullah, Junaidi, & Hayati, L. (2025). Analisis Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar pada Materi Sistem Persamaan Linier Dua Variabel (SPLDV) kelas VIII MTs Mu’allimat NW Anjani Tahun Pelajaran 2024/2025. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 10(1), 234–244. https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i01.23330
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sukmawati, A., Hayati, L., & Baidowi, N. H. (2023). Analisis Kemampuan Representasi Matematis pada Materi Program Linear Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar Siswa. Journal of Classroom Action Research, 5(2), 210–219. https://doi.org/10.29303/jcar.v5iSpecialIssue.3980
Suningsih, A., & Istiani, A. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 225–234. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v10i2.655
Umaroh, U., & Pujiastuti, H. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa dalam Mengerjakan Soal PISA Ditinjau dari Perbedaan Gender. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Raflesia, 5(2), 40–53. https://doi.org/10.33369/jpmr.v5i2.11408
Voyer, D., & Voyer, S. D. (2014). Gender Differences in Scholastic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1174–1204. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036620
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15548/mej.v10i2.15105
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Author

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jl. Prof. Mahmud Yunus Lubuk Lintah, Anduring, Kec. Kuranji, Kota Padang, Sumatera Barat 25153 Email: [email protected] |




