Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Menggunakan Strategi Active Learning Dengan Cara Giving Questions And Getting Answers Dengan Pembelajaran Konvensional Di Kelas X Sma Ekasakti Padang

Yuliani Fitri, Refnywidialistuti Refnywidialistuti

Abstract


The study is a kind of experimental one conducted to two groups, an experimental group and controlled group. The purpose of the study was to figure out whether students’ learning achievement by using giving questions and getting answers of active learning strategy better than those of conventional learning. The finding of the study is supposed to be useful for the researcher in teaching and to be guidance for teachers in mathematics learning. Population of the study were all of the students grade X TP 2017/2018 of Eka Sakti Senior High School, consisting of three classes.The samples were XIS1 as the controlled class consistingof 22 students and XIS2 as the experimental class consisting of 22 students. Data collected by having a test to the experimental class and controlled class. Normality and homogeneity tests were conducted before doing hypothesis test. The students’ learning achievement were normal and homogeny. Based on the analysis of hyphothesis tetsting, it can be concluded that application of active learning strategy by giving questions and getting answers can increase students’ mathematics learning achievement for 95% level of realibility. Therefore, it is hopped that teachers will apply active learning strategy by giving questions and getting answers in teaching learning process of mathematics due to its significant effect to learning achievement of the students.

Keywords: learning achievement, active learning, giving questions and getting answers


Full Text:

PDF


DOI: https://doi.org/10.15548/mej.v2i2.188
Abstract views : 251 times
PDF : 207 times

References


Al-Qur’an dan Terjemahnya

Ahmad, Abu. Dkk. (1991). Ilmu Pendidikan.Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.

Arief, Armai. (2002). Pengantar ilmu dan metodologi pendidikan islam. Jakarta :Ciputat Pres.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. (1997). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta Rineka Cipta.

Djamarah, Syaiful. (2000). Guru dan Anak Didik dalam Interaksi Edukatif. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.

Djamarah, dan Bahri, Syaiful. (2002). Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Hamalik Oemar. (2001). Pendekatan Baru Strategi Belajar Mengajar Berdasarkan CBSA. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algesindo.

Hasibuan Dan Moedjiono. (1985). Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Margono. (1996). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Semarang : Rineka Cipta

Pramironegoro. 1985. Evaluasi Hasil Belajar Khusus Analisis Soal untuk Bidang Studi Matematika. Jakarta : PPLPTK.

Santoso, Singgih. 2001. SPSS. Jakarta :Gramedia.

Sardiman A.M.1999. Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta : PT. Raja Gravindo Persada.

Semiawan C, dkk. 1992. Pendekatan Keterampilan Proses. Jakarta : Gramedia

Silberman, Melvin L. 2006. Active Learning.101 Cara Belajar Siswa Aktif. Bandung: Nusamedia.

Slameto, 1995. Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.

Sudjana, Nana.1989.Dasar-Dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung : Sinar Baru Algesindo Offset.

Sudjana. 2001. Metoda Statistika. Bandung: Tarsito.

Suryabrata, Sumadi. 2003. Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta : Grafindo.

Undang-Undang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional (UU RI NO.20 TH.2003). Jakarta : Sinar Grafika.

Walpole, Ronald E. 1995. Pengantar Statistika. Jakarta : PT Gramedia pustaka Utama.

Winkel W. S. 1996. Psikologi Pembelajaran. Jakarta : Grasindo Zaini, Hisyam, dkk. 2005. Strategi Pembelajaran Aktif. Yogyakarta : Nuansa Aksara Grafika.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Ruang Jurnal Program Studi Tadris Matematika
Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan
Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bojol Padang
email: mej.uinibpadang@gmail.com

 

Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-NonKomersial 4.0 Internasional.